Table 6.
GRADE evidence profile table for restoration survival: lithium disilicate versus indirect resin composite
| Quality assessment | No of restorations | Effect | Quality | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No of studies | Design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Lithium disilicate | Indirect resin composite | Absolute | |
| 3 | RCT’s1 | Serious2 | No serious inconsistency | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | 0/75 (0%) | 0/75 (0%) | - |
Moderate |
ORange of follow-up: 12–24 months
1All studies randomized clinical trials, starting from high-quality level of evidence
2Some concerns of risk of bias in ROB-2
3Non-significant effect