Skip to main content
. 1998 Jun;36(6):1814–1818. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1814-1818.1998

TABLE 4.

Numbers of correctly identified spiked samples in relation to spore concentrationa

Laboratory No. of correctly identified samples spiked with:
102E. hellem spores/g (n = 2)b 103E. intestinalis spores/g (n = 2)c 104E. hellem or E. cuniculi spores/g (n = 2 each)d 106E. hellem, E. cuniculi, or E. intestinalis spores/g (n = 2 each)e
M1 0 0 0 6
M2 0 0 0 4
M3 0 0 0 4
M4 0 0 0 4
M5 0 0 0 0
M6 0 0 1 4
P1 2 2 4 6
P2 1 1 3 4
P3 0 2 0 6
P4 0 0 1 2
P5 0 1 0 2
a

Without species identification and without laboratory P6. 

b

The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 0% at the light microscopy laboratories and 30% at the PCR laboratories. 

c

The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 0% at the light microscopy laboratories and 60% at the PCR laboratories. 

d

The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 4% at the light microscopy laboratories and 40% at the PCR laboratories. 

e

The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 61% at the light microscopy laboratories and 67% at the PCR laboratories.