TABLE 4.
Numbers of correctly identified spiked samples in relation to spore concentrationa
Laboratory | No. of correctly identified samples spiked with:
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
102E. hellem spores/g (n = 2)b | 103E. intestinalis spores/g (n = 2)c | 104E. hellem or E. cuniculi spores/g (n = 2 each)d | 106E. hellem, E. cuniculi, or E. intestinalis spores/g (n = 2 each)e | |
M1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
M2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
M3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
M4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
M5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
P1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
P2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
P3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
P4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
P5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Without species identification and without laboratory P6.
The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 0% at the light microscopy laboratories and 30% at the PCR laboratories.
The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 0% at the light microscopy laboratories and 60% at the PCR laboratories.
The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 4% at the light microscopy laboratories and 40% at the PCR laboratories.
The average percentages of correctly identified samples at this concentration were 61% at the light microscopy laboratories and 67% at the PCR laboratories.