Table 2.
Ranking the perception of students with regards to advantages of RSCS as a teaching tool using the Friedman rank test.
| Domain | Mean Score | Rank Score |
|---|---|---|
| RSCS is more exciting and enjoyable than traditional methods | 4.66 | 1 |
| Overall, I was satisfied with the RSCS as a learning method. | 4.54 | 2 |
| RSCS encourages students to participate in the learning process | 4.46 | 3 |
| RSCS motivated me to do my best work. | 4.44 | 4 |
| RSCS is more effective in achieving learning objectives | 4.42 | 5 |
| RSCS encourages students teamwork and acquires interpersonal skills | 4.38 | 6 |
| RSCS has promoted my ability to work as a team member. | 4.32 | 7 |
| RSCS has helped me to develop problem-solving skills related to critical care management. | 4.3 | 8 |
| RSCS gives the best realistic knowledge of critical care management | 4.26 | 9 |
| RSCS has improved my analytic skills. | 4.18 | 10 |
| RSCS developed my planning ability in work | 4.12 | 11 |
| RSCS stimulated us to search for various resources by ourselves | 3.82 | 12 |
| RSCS produced a lot of pressure on me as a student | 2.46 | 13 |
RSCS: realistic simulation case scenario.