Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;21(4):354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.08.001

Table 2.

The subgroup meta-analyses of HIIT on MFO (g/min) compared with MICT.

n MD 95% CI pd I2 ph pt
Intensity
 Fatmax (44–52%VO2max) 35 0.03 −0.01 to 0.07 0.13 73% 0.05 0.13
 non-Fatmax (60%VO2max) 112 0.00 −0.02 to 0.01 0.69 0% 0.57
Mode
 Cycling 115 0.01 −0.02 to 0.05 0.49 62% 0.05 n/a
 Running 32 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
BMI category (kg/m2)
 30∼35 kg/m2 96 0.00 −0.03 to 0.03 0.96 0% 0.44 0.42
 >35 kg/m2 51 0.02 −0.03 to 0.07 0.34 89% <0.01
Age
 18∼50yr 67 0.02 −0.01 to 0.05 0.56 77% <0.01 0.15
 >50yr 80 −0.03 −0.08 to −0.03 0.34 0% 0.58
Sex
 Male 35 0.03 0.00 to 0.06 0.13 73% 0.05 0.13
 Male + Female 112 0.00 −0.02 to 0.01 0.76 0% 0.57

MD: Pooled mean difference (g/min) between the observed effects of HIIT and MICT.