Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;7(9):e10780. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10780

Table 4.

Principal component analysis to categorize contributors to bone outcomes in women (A) and men (B).

A. Analyses in whole cohort of women
Variable PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5
Percentage of variance 40.2 12.4 9.6 7.6 6.9
Cumulative percentage of variance explained 40.2 52.7 62.2 69.8 76.7
Eigenvalue 6.04 1.87 1.44 1.14 1.03
Descriptive interpretation Body size Lean mass Age Mixed Lifestyle
Age −0.006 −0.129 0.682 0.061 −0.101
Height 0.392 0.030 −0.117 0.051 −0.047
Weight 0.101 0.400 −0.165 0.603 −0.112
BMI 0.363 −0.163 −0.045 −0.240 0.005
Smoker 0.016 0.181 0.091 −0.396 0.562
Alcohol 0.014 0.159 −0.045 0.241 0.434
Total body fat 0.364 −0.153 −0.167 0.035 −0.043
Lean body mass 0.306 0.413 0.065 0.059 −0.042
Trunk fat mass 0.379 −0.192 −0.123 0.036 0.023
Trunk lean mass 0.291 0.402 0.148 −0.024 −0.026
Central fat mass 0.348 −0.273 −0.004 0.008 0.106
Central lean mass 0.161 0.406 0.291 −0.329 0.063
VAT mass 0.306 −0.265 0.137 0.057 0.111
25OHD −0.066 −0.112 −0.050 0.303 0.662
eGFR −0.064 0.151 −0.554 −0.385 −0.028
B. Analyses in whole cohort of men
Variable PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5
Percentage of variance 37.0 18.9 10.2 7.7 7.1
Cumulative percentage of variance explained 37.0 55.8 66.1 73.7 80.8
Eigenvalue 5.54 2.83 1.53 1.15 1.06
Descriptive interpretation Body size Lean mass Age Alcohol Smoking
Age −0.088 −0.164 0.489 −0.247 0.051
Height 0.409 0.129 0.043 −0.001 −0.074
Weight 0.127 0.363 0.029 0.140 −0.439
BMI 0.388 −0.061 0.029 −0.084 0.170
Smoker 0.019 0.111 −0.226 −0.296 0.673
Alcohol −0.015 0.047 −0.171 0.735 0.288
Total body fat 0.384 −0.190 −0.029 0.006 −0.029
Lean body mass 0.274 0.422 0.114 −0.014 −0.080
Trunk fat mass 0.385 −0.223 −0.016 0.032 −0.043
Trunk lean mass 0.267 0.422 0.095 −0.012 0.005
Central fat mass 0.314 −0.332 0.018 0.080 0.092
Central lean mass 0.102 0.399 0.094 −0.137 0.387
VAT mass 0.318 −0.302 0.033 0.073 0.047
25OHD −0.068 0.043 0.448 0.500 0.244
eGFR 0.034 0.058 −0.665 0.051 −0.069

Note: The top five components that were above the 1.0‐eigenvalue threshold, contributed almost 77% of the total variability of the bone characteristics. The top five components that were above the 1.0‐eigenvalue threshold contributed 80% of the total variability of the bone characteristics. The highest weights (>0.3) are bolded.