Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 7;12(9):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.6

Table 3.

Cluster Analysis for iAMD Features and Spatial Delineations

Cluster Analysis Spatial Delineations, %
Quadrants Eccentricity (Ring °)
Clusters Cluster Sizes (% per 69 Stimuli) β-Coefficient (× 10−2), Mean (95% CI) Change per −1 dB (µm) Superior Inferior P Nasal Temporal P 10° P
Drusen load 0 65.2% (45/69) −0.22 (−1.02 to 0.57)
−1 34.8% (24/69) 7.37 (8.21 to6.53)**** 13.57 57 25 *** 30 28 0.79 80 0 5 45 63 ****
Sensitivity Differences (dB) Effect Size (Z-Score)
PA 0 69.6% (48/69) −0.68 (−1.66 to 0.29) −0.65
−1 30.4% (21/69) 2.23 (3.36 to1.1)** 2.23 36 16 ** 36 33 0.72 100 88 40 5 0 ****
RPD 0 69.6% (48/69) −0.53 (−1.28 to 0.23) −0.55
−1 30.4% (21/69) 1.07 (2 to0.14)** 0.86 55 0 **** 43 23 0.25 0 38 30 35 31 ****

Presentation is as in Table 2. Drusen load was measured by RPE-BM thickness (µm), and pigmentary abnormality (PA) and RPD were measured by presence or absence.

Significant differences are bolded. For multiple comparisons with significant differences (i.e., comparison between eccentricities/rings), the greatest magnitude (%) is bolded.