Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 20;18(6):657–665. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30113-0

Table 2:

Poliovirus type 2 response after vaccination with different study vaccines and schedules in modified intention-to-treat population

4 weeks after two mOPV2 doses
4 weeks after two mOPV2 doses with or without IPV
4 weeks after one mOPV2 dose with or without IPV
1 week group 2 week group 4 week group 1 week vs 4 week group (difference [90% CI] or p value) 2 week vs 4 week group (difference [90% CI] or p value) 4 week plus IPV group 4 week group p value 4 week plus IPV group 4 week group p value

Immune response 161/173 (93⋅1%; 88⋅3–96⋅0) 169/177 (95 5%; 91⋅3-97⋅7) 176/181 (97⋅2%; 93⋅7-98⋅8) −4⋅2% (−7⋅9 to −0⋅4)* −1⋅8% (−5⋅0 to 1⋅5)* 176/182 (96⋅7%; 93⋅0-98⋅5) 176/181 (97⋅2%; 93⋅7-98⋅8) 1⋅0 154/169 (91⋅1%; 85⋅9-94⋅6) 157/172 (91⋅3%; 86⋅1-94⋅6) 1⋅0
Antibody titres 1448 (1152⋅1448) 1448 (910⋅1448) 1448 (1152⋅1448) p=0⋅243 p=0⋅059 1448 (1152⋅1448) 1448 (1152⋅1448) 0⋅758 1448 (724⋅1448) 1152 (724⋅1448) 0⋅691

Outcomes for poliovirus type 2 response include the proportion of infants with immune response expressed as n/N (%; 95% CI), and reciprocal antibody titres expressed as median (IQR). mOPV2=monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2. IPV=inactivated poliovirus vaccine.

*

Non-inferiority test results are presented using the difference (experimental-standard) in the proportion of infants with immune response with 90% CIs.

Inequality hypothesis tests were done with Fisher's exact test for proportions and with Kruskal-Wallis test for antibody titre distributions.