Table 7. Comparison of the best optimum solution for the speed reducer problem.
| Algorithm | Parameters values | f min | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x 1 | x 2 | x 3 | x 4 | x 5 | x 6 | x 7 | ||
| TSO | 3.501019 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 7.917685 | 3.367619 | 5.349237 | 3,043.966 |
| CTSO1 | 3.499917 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.994088 | 7.911673 | 3.787018 | 5.28737 | 3,133.385 |
| CTSO2 | 3.504471 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.99709 | 7.857388 | 3.35903 | 5.287425 | 3,008.135 |
| CTSO3 | 3.49999 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 7.715319 | 3.350541 | 5.286655 | 2,994.423 |
| CTSO4 | 3.499871 | 0.7 | 17 | 8.067661 | 8.067661 | 3.361258 | 5.345938 | 3,050.252 |
| CTSO5 | 3.499944 | 0.7 | 17 | 8.006041 | 7.768105 | 3.353007 | 5.288778 | 3,003.839 |
| CTSO6 | 3.500284 | 0.7 | 17 | 8.048994 | 8.074678 | 3.35588 | 5.29533 | 3,015.958 |
| CTSO7 | 3.509419 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.630128 | 8.036515 | 3.373788 | 5.28744 | 3,014.590 |
| CTSO8 | 3.499876 | 0.7 | 17 | 8.014485 | 7.877796 | 3.352811 | 5.356255 | 3,050.025 |
| CTSO9 | 3.49999 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 7.715319 | 3.350541 | 5.286654 | 2,994.423 |
| CTSO10 | 3.500698 | 0.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 8.072679 | 3.361987 | 5.335593 | 3,036.987 |