Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;8(9):1801–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.06.018

Table 1.

Patients eligible for rapid progressor status according to strategies based on ERA-EDTA WGIKD/ERBP recommendation

Criterion for RP ADPKD All patients (N = 768) Turkey (N = 71) Taiwan (N = 107) Korea (N = 300) China (N = 90) Australia (N = 200)
Total RPs, n (%) 426 (55.5) 34 (47.9) 25 (23.4) 200 (66.7) 73 (81.1) 94 (47.0)
eGFR decline in 1 yeara, n (%) 195 (25.4) 21 (29.6) 23 (21.5) 37 (12.3) 61 (67.9) 53 (26.5)
eGFR decline over 5 yearsb, n (%) 38 (5.0) 7 (9.9) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.3) 20 (22.2) 7 (3.5)
Historical htTKV growthc, n (%) 7 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 7 (2.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Mayo imaging classification 1C-1E, n (%) 274 (35.7) 12 (16.9) 0 (0.0) 188 (62.8) 24 (26.7) 50 (25.0)
Kidney length (>16 cm), n (%) 6 (0.8) 1 (1.4) 2 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (1.5)
PKD1 PT mutation and PROPKD score (>6), n (%) 39 (5.1%) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 39 (13.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; htTKV, height-adjusted total kidney volume; PKD1 PT, PKD1 protein truncating; RP, rapid progressor.

%, proportion of patients to total number of eligible patients.

a

≥5 ml/min per 1.73 m2.

b

≥2.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2/yr.

c

htTKV ≥5%/yr.