Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e073219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219

Table 2.

Base-case cost–utility results for patients with mild-to-severe primary open angle glaucoma in rural setting

Costs per person, US$ QALYs per person Incremental costs per person, US$ Incremental QALYs per person ICURs, US$
5 years
 MMT 3570 3.14
 TRAB 7709 3.33 4139 0.19 21 462
 AGV implantation 9017 3.34 5447 0.20 27 470
 GATT 9848 3.37 6278 0.23 26 945
 ABiC 10 471 3.38 6901 0.24 29 178
10 years
 MMT 6458 5.65
 TRAB 11 542 5.91 5084 0.26 19 675
 AGV implantation 12 619 5.94 6161 0.29 21 151
 GATT 12 613 5.97 6155 0.31 19 619
 ABiC 13 598 6.05 7140 0.40 18 003

Costs are given in US dollars. ICURs were calculated against maximal medical treatment. The cost-effectiveness threshold was US$30 501 per QALY gained for rural setting and US$41 568 per QALY gained for urban setting.

ABiC, ab interno canaloplasty; AGV, Ahmed glaucoma valve; GATT, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy; GDP, gross domestic product; ICUR, incremental cost–utility ratio; MMT, maximal medical treatment; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; TRAB, trabeculectomy.