Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e073219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219

Table 3.

Base-case cost–utility results for patients with mild-to-severe primary open angle glaucoma in urban setting

Costs per person, US$ QALYs per person Incremental costs per person, US$ Incremental QALYs per person ICURs, US$
5 years
 MMT 3117 3.14
 TRAB 6045 3.33 2928 0.19 15 242
 AGV implantation 7454 3.34 4337 0.20 21 955
 GATT 8317 3.37 5200 0.23 22 400
 ABiC 8920 3.38 5803 0.24 24 619
10 years
 MMT 5761 5.66
 TRAB 9196 5.91 3435 0.26 13 379
 AGV implantation 10 459 5.95 4698 0.29 16 223
 GATT 10 649 5.97 4888 0.31 15 675
 ABiC 11 366 6.05 5605 0.39 14 203

Costs are given in US dollars. ICURs were calculated against maximal medical treatment. The cost-effectiveness threshold was US$30 501 per QALY gained for rural setting and US$41 568 per QALY gained for urban setting.

ABiC, ab interno canaloplasty; AGV, Ahmed glaucoma valve; GATT, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy; GDP, gross domestic product; ICUR, incremental cost–utility ratio; MMT, maximal medical treatment; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; TRAB, trabeculectomy.