Table 6.

Simple Correlations between Habitual Emotion Judgments and Conceptually Related Constructs

	Pos Judge Pos Emotions	Neg Judge Pos Emotions	Pos Judge Neg Emotions	Neg Judge Neg Emotions
Conceptually Related Emotion Constructs
Affect Valuation
Positive Emotions	.37 s	−.22 s	−.03	−.02
High-Arousal Positive Emotions	.41 s	−.21 s	.04	−.02
Low-Arousal Positive Emotions	.32 s	−.16	.04	−.05
Negative Emotions	−.31 s	.21 s	.02	.10
High-Arousal Negative Emotions	−.32 s	.21 s	.03	.13
Low-Arousal Negative Emotions	−.29 s	.16	.01	.10
Preferences for
Self-Transcending Positive Emotions	.38 s	−.25 s	.06	−.12
Opening Positive Emotions	.36 s	−.18	.12	−.14
Conserving Positive Emotions	.22 s	−.16	.10	−.15
Self-Enhancing Negative Emotions	−.33 s	.19	.00	.00
Attitudes Towards a
Joy	.58 s	−.39 s	.04	−.07
Anger	−.33 s	.30 s	.13	.07
Sad	.01	.20 s	.19	.04
Disgust	−.29 s	.26 s	.00	.11
Fear	−.15 s	.16	.09	.05
Meta-Emotions: Anger About One’s Emotions	−.18	.38 s	−.07	.48 s
Fear of Happiness	−.35 s	.51 s	.03	.28 s
Stress Mindsets a	−.20 s	.12	.37 s	−.24 s
Emotional Acceptance	.07	−.29s	.14	−.53 s

Note. Analyses were conducted in Sample E. Bolded correlations are statistically significant at an alpha level of .05.

^sCorrelations fall in the preregistered “sibling construct” effect size range of .20-.60.

^aMore positive values indicate more positive/less negative attitudes/mindset.