Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;13(9):5641–5652. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-36

Table 1. The comparison of patient background between recurrence and non-recurrence.

Variables Recurrence (n=26) Non-recurrence (n=64) P value
Age (years) 68 [62–71] 68 [62–72] 0.758
SUVmax on FDG-PET 5.70 [3.50–7.67] 5.09 [3.32–7.04] 0.408
Serum CEA level 4.00 [2.40–6.40] 3.70 [2.18–7.70] 0.841
2DS (mm) 24.5 [18.3–29.8] 21 [17.0–28.5] 0.101
Sex (male), n (%) 14 (53.8) 47 (73.4) 0.085
Smoking, n (%) 0.124
   Non-smoker 13 (50.0) 19 (29.7)
   Ex-smoker 10 (38.4) 27 (58.6)
   Current smoker 3 (11.5) 18 (28.1)
Procedure, n (%) 0.270
   Lobectomy 25 (96.2) 55 (85.9)
   Segmentectomy/sublobar 1 (0.8) 9 (14.1)
Pleural invasion, n (%) 0.010
   + 20 (76.9) 29 (45.3)
   − 6 (23.1) 35 (54.7)
Lymphatic invasion, n (%) 0.167
   + 9 (34.6) 12 (18.8)
   − 17 (65.4) 52 (81.2)
Vascular invasion, n (%) 0.285
   + 5 (19.2) 6 (9.4)
   − 21 (80.8) 58 (90.6)
EGFR, n (%) 0.044
   Mutant 12 (46.1) 15 (23.4)
   WT 14 (53.9) 49 (76.6)

Data are shown as median [IQR] or n (%). SUVmax, maximum standard uptake value; FDG PET, [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; 2DS, tumor diameter on two-dimensional axial CT; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; WT, wild type; IQR, interquartile range; CT, computed tomography.