Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;381:e071620. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071620

Table 2.

Bias aspects of studies included in the meta-analyses

First author, year Misclassification and measurement error of outcome Control of confounding Selection bias/loss to follow-up Risk of bias*
Socioeconomic control Time varying exposure control A B C D Overall
Active case ascertainment studies
Oudin, 201616 Mostly active: in-person assessment supplemented with MR (some MR only) Individual level adjustment Not time varying exposure Full follow-up Some Low Low Some Some
Astrom 202120 Mostly active: in-person assessment supplemented with MR (some MR only) Individual level adjustment Not time varying exposure Full follow-up Some Low Low Some Some
Wang, 202223 Active: in-person or telephone screening followed by in-person assessment Individual and area level adjustment;
Adjustment for potential mediators
Not time varying exposures Weighting to address loss to follow-up High* Low Some Low High*
Grande, 202025 Active: in-person assessment supplemented with death and medical records Individual level adjustment;
Adjustment for potential mediators
Time varying exposure with adjustment for time trend 6-11% loss to follow-up High* Low Some Low High*
Paul, 202026 Active: in-person screening, with neuropsychological exam follow-up reviewed by neurologist and neuropsychologist review Individual and area level adjustment Not time varying exposures Weighting to address loss to follow-up Some Low Some Low Some
Mortamais 202129 Active: 3 phase in-person assessment, review by geriatric specialist Individual level adjustment Not time varying exposure Weighting to address loss to follow-up High Low Some Low High
Semmens, 202130 Active; screening followed by neuropsychological battery, neurological evaluation and adjudication Individual and area level adjustment Not time varying exposure Approaches to limit selective attrition in study design Some Low Some Low Some
Shaffer 202131 Active: in-person assessments, follow-up physical, neuropsychological evaluations reviewed by consensus Individual and area level adjustment Time varying exposure with adjustment for time trends 14% loss to follow-up Some Low Some Low Some
Sullivan, 202132 Active: in-person Clinical Dementia Rating assessment by trained interviewers (case=rating >1) Individual level adjustment Time varying exposure, no adjustment for time trends No information on loss to follow-up High Low High* Low High
Passive case ascertainment studies
Chen, 201737 Passive: ICD codes and prescriptions Area level adjustment Time varying exposures; reported no difference in results with time trend adjustment Likely low; province wide data, required residence >5 years High High Low High* High
Carey, 201839 Passive: Primary care record Quality and Outcomes Framework Read Codes, and death ICD codes Area level adjustment Not time varying exposures Censored if GP withdrew from CPRD; patient loss to follow-up not known Some High Low High* High
Cerza, 201943 Passive: ICD codes Area level adjustment Not time varying exposure Loss to follow-up discussed High High Low High* High
Smargiassi, 202052 Passive: ICD codes and prescriptions Area level adjustment Time varying exposure with time trend adjustment Likely low; province wide data, required residence >4 years High High Low High* High
Ran, 202156 Passive: ICD codes Individual level adjustment Not time varying exposure Likely none; Hong Kong wide data Some High Low High* High
Shi, 202159 Passive: ICD codes Individual (Medicaid eligibility) and area level adjustment Time varying exposure with time trend adjustment Likely low; all ≥65 years;
nationwide data
Some High Low High* High
Parra, 202262 Passive: ICD codes Individual level adjustment Not time varying exposure Censoring for loss to follow-up Some High Low High* High

CPRD=Clinical Practice Research Datalink; GP=general practitioner; ICD=International Classification of Diseases MR=medical records.

*

Indicates that the likely direction of bias would be towards the null and no other bias is greater than some. Risk of bias domains: A=Confounding; B=Post-exposure intervention; C=Missing data; D=Measurement of the outcome. All studies were rated some risk of bias in the domains of “Measurement of the exposure” and “Selection of reported results,” and low risk of bias in the domain of “Selection of participants.”