Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 13;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00662-8

Table 4.

Subjective stability and comfort scores in different textured insoles and ankle brace conditions

Variables Conditions Protrusion Heights Insole Type Ankle Brace Interaction
0 mm 1 mm 2 mm F P η2p F P η2p F P η2p
Stability(mm) Without braces 43.9 ± 18.3 48.2 ± 16.5 53.1 ± 17.9ab 8.446 0.004 0.332 13.140 0.002 0.436 1.102 0.341 0.061
With braces 54.0 ± 14.8 58.3 ± 16.3 68.6 ± 14.5ab
Comfort(mm) Without braces 58.6 ± 15.0 55.9 ± 17.9 50.1 ± 13.6 0.006 0.987 < 0.001 2.294 0.148 0.119 8.629 0.002 0.337
With braces 56.4 ± 18.4 59.6 ± 14.9 65.6 ± 16.7

0 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm represent insoles with protrusion heights of 0 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. The subscripts ‘a’ and ‘b’ denote significant differences from textured insoles with 0-mm and 1-mm protrusions, respectively, η2p: partial eta-squared. P values marked with bold indicate statistically significant differences. Effect size (partial eta-squared) was interpreted as small (η2p ≥ 0.01), medium (η2p ≥ 0.06), or large (η2p ≥ 0.14)