Extended Data Fig. 6. Cluster-based permutation testing during a period of anticipation of reward variables from two tasks with different contrasts in the dlHPC.

(A) z-score normalized difference spectrograms between the sweet-fat minus the taste-neutral items in the sweet-fat incentive paradigm. Note, this is a repeat of Fig. 1c included here as a reference. (B-C) z-score normalized difference spectrograms in the Monetary Incentive Delay task (MID; see Fig. S1B), which provided two different contrasts: anticipation of monetary loss minus anticipation of 0-loss (B) and anticipation of monetary gain minus anticipation of 0-gain (C). Normalization for spectral power for the MID task was performed as described for the sweet-fat incentive paradigm. Note that the low frequency power cluster is specific to the sweet-fat cue and is not elicited by other visual cues associated with reward anticipation in the non-feeding domain (loss vs. 0-loss contrast and gain vs. 0-gain contrast).