Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 29;40(10):4282–4297. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02583-1

Table 1.

Modelling methodology: values used for simulations

Subject Age range (years) FEV1 lung function decline (mL/year)a Moderate/severe exacerbation rate/yearb Months between exacerbationsb Months between exacerbations therapy with ICS/LAMA/LABAc Months between exacerbations therapy with LAMA/LABAc FEV1 increase with ICS/LAMA/LABA at week 52 (mL)c FEV1 increase with LAMA/LABA at week 52 (mL)c
General population (no known COPD and never/non-smokers) 25–75 29
COPD 40–49 40 0.5 24 44 32 94 40
COPD 50–57 63 1 12 22 16 94 40
COPD 58–67 58 2 6 11 8 94 40
COPD 68–75 35 3 4 7 5 94 40

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, ICS inhaled corticosteroid, LABA long-acting beta2-agonist, LAMA long-acting anti-muscarinic antagonist

aBased on typical values and pattern of decline over time from the literature [2, 3, 9, 10, 14, 15, 30, 33, 3655, 57]

bBased on assumption of increasing annual exacerbation frequency from 0.5 to 3 with age; frequency assigned to correspond with typical lifetime exacerbation frequency [33]

cAverage values for magnitude of ICS/LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA treatment effects were used, corresponding with those seen in the IMPACT study [33]