Table 2.
Visit statistics | Netarsudil 0.02% QD |
Ripasudil 0.4% BID |
|
---|---|---|---|
N = 122 | N = 123 | ||
Week 1 | LS mean ± SE | 16.28 ± 0.143 | 17.87 ± 0.141 |
Difference from ripasudil 0.4% (Netarsudil – ripasudil) |
− 1.59 | ||
95% CI | (− 1.98, − 1.20) | ||
p value | < 0.0001 | ||
Week 2 | LS mean ± SE | 16.02 ± 0.168 | 17.83 ± 0.166 |
Difference from ripasudil 0.4% (Netarsudil − ripasudil) |
− 1.81 | ||
95% CI | (− 2.28, − 1.35) | ||
p value | < 0.0001 | ||
Week 4 (Primary endpoint) |
LS mean ± SE | 15.96 ± 0.157 | 17.71 ± 0.155 |
Difference from ripasudil 0.4% (Netarsudil − ripasudil) |
− 1.74 | ||
95% CI | (− 2.17, − 1.31) | ||
p value | < 0.0001 |
LS means, SEs, CIs (2-sided), and p values (2-sided) are from ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor and baseline diurnal mean as a covariate; missing data was supplemented by Monte Carlo Markov Chain
BID twice a day, CI confidence interval, IOP intraocular pressure, ITT intent-to-treat, LS least squares mean, N number of patients in the given treatment of ITT population, QD once a day, SE standard error