Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 21;40(10):4639–4656. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02550-w

Table 5.

AEs in ≥ 1.0% of patients in any group (safety population)

System organ class
preferred term
Number (%) of patients
Netarsudil 0.02%
QD
N = 122
Ripasudil 0.4%
BID
N = 123
p valuea
Eye disorders 73 (59.8) 80 (65.0) 0.4302
 Conjunctival hyperemia 67 (54.9) 77 (62.6) 0.2441
 Eye irritation 7 (5.7) 7 (5.7)  > 0.9999
 Conjunctival hemorrhage 6 (4.9) 0 0.0143
 Visual acuity reduced 3 (2.5) 0 0.1219
 Conjunctival oedema 2 (1.6) 0 0.2469
 Cornea verticillata 2 (1.6) 0 0.2469
 Eye discharge 2 (1.6) 0 0.2469
 Eye pruritus 2 (1.6) 2 (1.6)  > 0.9999
 Punctate keratitis 2 (1.6) 1 (0.8) 0.6219
 Vision blurred 2 (1.6) 0 0.2469

When reporting incidence, a patient was counted once if they ever experienced an event within the system organ class or individual preferred term more than once

AEs were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, in Japanese (MedDRA/J), v.23.1

AE adverse events, BID twice a day, N number of patients in the given treatment of safety population, QD once a day

Percentages are based on the number of patients (N) in the given treatment group for the safety population

ap values are from Fisher’s exact test comparing the incidence between netarsudil 0.02% and ripasudil 0.4%