Skip to main content
letter
. 2023 Jun 6;7(18):5199–5201. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010067

Table 1.

Recommendations on prevention of VTE based on the patient populations and interventions

Patients who are acutely ill: pharmacological prophylaxis, addressing the following comparisons:
 Parenteral anticoagulant vs no parenteral anticoagulant
 LMWH vs unfractionated heparin
 Fondaparinux vs low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin
Patients who are critically ill: pharmacological prophylaxis, addressing the following comparisons:
 Any heparin vs no heparin
 LMWH vs unfractionated heparin
Patients who are acutely or critically ill: mechanical prophylaxis, addressing the following comparisons:
 Mechanical vs pharmacological prophylaxis
 Mechanical vs no prophylaxis
 Mechanical combined with pharmacological vs mechanical alone
 Mechanical combined with pharmacological vs pharmacological alone
 Intermittent pneumatic compression stockings vs graduated compression stockings
DOACs in medical patients who are acutely ill
 DOACs vs prophylactic LMWH
 Extended-duration DOACs vs shorter-duration non-DOAC prophylaxis
Extended-duration outpatient prophylaxis vs inpatient-only prophylaxis
 Medical patients who are acutely ill
 Medical patients who are critically ill
Patients who are chronically ill or those in nursing home
 Pharmacological prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis
Medical outpatients with minor provoking factors for VTE (eg, immobility, minor injury, illness, and infection)
 Prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis
Long-distance travelers: prophylaxis addressing the following comparisons:
 Graduated compression stockings
 LMWH
 Aspirin vs no prophylaxis

Adapted from the article by Schünemann et al.3

DOACS, direct oral anticoagulants; LMHW, low molecular weight heparin.