Ultracentrifugation |
140–600 min |
Low cost, few reagents and consumables, high volume of specimens, no additional chemicals. |
High equipment requirements, operational complexity and time, contamination of the finished product (presence of protein aggregates, apoptotic vesicles and other particles), low RNA yields, vesicles can be damaged; efficiency is influenced by rotor type, force magnitude, and sample viscosity. |
Momen-Heravi et al. (2013), Livshits et al. (2015), Bryzgunova et al. (2016) and Patel et al. (2019)
|
Density gradient ultracentrifugation |
250 min-2 day |
Pure formulation; no viral particle contamination after centrifugation of iododiol; no additional chemicals. |
Small capacity, complex, laborious and time-consuming, expensive equipment, samples can be lost, contamination of viral particles in sucrose density gradient method, long procedure time, low yield. |
Van Deun et al. (2014), Greening et al. (2015), Lobb et al. (2015) and Abramowicz et al. (2016)
|
Ultrafiltration |
130 min |
Simple procedure, allowing simultaneous processing of many samples; pure formulations; additional chemicals; no limitations on sample volume. |
Filter clogging, sample loss (large size vesicle rupture), protein contamination, vesicle deformation, small amounts of exosomal proteins. |
Salih et al. (2014), Lobb et al. (2015) and Taylor and Shah (2015)
|
Size-exclusive Chromatography |
1 mL/min |
High purity; maintains vesicle integrity; high sensitivity with no loss; prevents MV aggregation; no additional chemicals. |
Specialized equipment; complex operation; no more than one sample processed in each process; high cost. |
Boing et al. (2014), Lobb et al. (2015), Nordin et al. (2015) and Taylor and Shah (2015)
|
Hydrophilic polymer precipitation |
65 min |
Simple cost and process; maintains MV integrity; no additional equipment required. |
Contamination of polymers, potential for co-precipitation of other non-vesicular contaminants. |
Andreu et al. (2016) and Gamez-Valero et al. (2016)
|