Table 3.

Poisson regression modeling the effect of crossed group assignment on eating behavior after controlling for demographic, biometric and self-report data.

	IRR	SE	z	P > |z|	95% CI
Crossed LPP & Theta Group
P>C & θCA>θBE	2.17	0.35	4.82	0.00	1.58 2.98
C>P & θBE>θCA	3.59	0.57	8.09	0.00	2.64 4.90
C>P & θCA>θBE	1.40	0.24	1.91	0.056	0.99 1.96
Age	1.03	0.005	6.79	0.00	1.02 1.04
Gender	3.36	0.46	8.91	0.00	2.57 4.39
Race Black/African American	0.51	0.10	−3.56	0.00	0.35 0.74
I prefer not to say	3.43e-06	0.001	−0.03	0.97	0.00 0.00
More than one race	0.27	−1.26	0.28	0.21	0.03 2.09
White	0.95	0.17	−0.26	0.80	0.67 1.36
BMI	1.00	0.01	−1.06	0.29	0.98 1.01
SLIM	1.00	0.00	−3.60	0.00	0.99 1.00
PFS	0.97	0.01	−5.49	0.00	0.96 0.98
FCQ	0.97	0.00	−10.54	0.00	0.96 0.97
WREQ-S	2.74	0.25	11.28	0.00	2.30 3.27
BIS AT	1.08	0.02	4.04	0.00	1.04 1.12
BIS MO	1.08	0.02	4.38	0.00	1.04 1.11
BIS NO	0.74	0.02	−11.72	0.00	0.71 0.78
PANAS −	1.00	0.01	0.44	0.66	0.99 1.02
PANAS +	0.99	0.01	−1.99	0.047	0.98 1.00
Intercept	12.34	7.04	4.41	0.00	4.04 37.73

IRR: Incidence rate ratio, SE: standard error, CI: confidence interval. WREQ-S: Weight-related Eating Questionnaire, susceptibility to external cues subscale; BIS-AT: Barratt Impulsivity Scale, attention subscale; BIS-MO: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, motor impulsiveness subscale; BIS NO: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, non-planning subscale; PANAS−: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, negative affect subscale; PANAS + : Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, positive affect subscale.