Graham et al.15
|
SARS-CoV-2 |
paired wastewater influent and primary
sludge
samples |
solid and liquid fractions were
separated by centrifugation;
the supernatant from influent samples was further processed using
PEG precipitation method; viral concentrations (N1 and N2) were measured
using RT-ddPCR |
Kd: 350–3100 |
calculated/reported as the solid-influent concentration
ratio |
Li et al.16
|
SARS-CoV-2 |
wastewater influent |
solid and liquid fractions were separated by centrifugation;
liquids were further processed using PEG precipitation method; viral
concentrations (N1, N2, and E gene) were measured using qPCR |
Kd: 4000–20,000 |
calculated/reported as the solid–liquid concentration
ratio |
Kim et al.40
|
SARS-CoV-2 |
paired wastewater influent and primary
sludge
samples |
solid and liquid fractions were
separated using
different processing techniques; viral concentrations (N1 and N2)
were measured using RT-ddPCR |
KF: 1000–100,000 |
calculated
using the Freundlich model; solid to influent ratio |
Kim et al.31
|
SARS-CoV-2 |
wastewater collected from sewer network |
solid and liquid fractions were separated by centrifugation;
liquids were further processed using a 0.45 μm pore size filter;
viral concentrations (N and S gene) were measured using RT-ddPCR |
Kd: 8600, 16,000 |
calculated/reported as the solid–liquid concentration
ratio |
Wolfe et al.41
|
influenza A |
paired wastewater influent
and primary sludge
samples |
solid and liquid fractions were
separated by centrifugation;
the supernatant from influent samples was further processed using
PEG precipitation method; viral concentrations (N1 and N2) were measured
using RT-ddPCR |
Kd: 1000 |
calculated/reported as the solid-influent concentration
ratio |
Mercier et al.2
|
influenza A |
wastewater and primary sludge samples |
solid and
liquid fractions were separated by centrifugation
and filtration using a 0.45 μm pore size filter; viral concentrations
were measured in settled solids, suspended solids, and liquid fractions
(supernatant) using RT-qPCR |
authors only reported the
percent of viral RNA adsorbed onto
wastewater solids, Kd was not reported |
Wolfe et al.19
|
Mpox |
paired
wastewater influent and primary sludge
samples |
influent samples were processed
using an affinity-based
capture method with magnetic hydrogel Nanotrap particles with enhancement
reagent 1; primary sludge samples were centrifuged to obtain solids;
viral concentrations were measured using RT-ddPCR |
Kd: 1000 |
calculated/reported
as the solid-influent concentration ratio |
Yin et al.20
|
adenovirus |
primary and secondary sludge |
solid and liquid fractions were separated by centrifugation;
viral concentrations were measured in the liquid fraction (supernatant)
using qPCR; viral concentrations in solids were estimated using a
mass balance equation |
KF: 37,000, 40,000 |
calculated using the Freundlich
model |
Yang et al.11
|
MS2, Phi6, Phix174, T4 |
primary sludge |
solid and liquid fractions were separated by centrifugation
and filtration using a 0.22 μm pore size filter; viral concentrations
were measured using qPCR |
KF: 4.1 × 106,
5.4 × 105, 1.2 × 105, and 8.5 ×
103 for Phi6, MS2, T4, and Phix174, respectively |