Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 13;8(5):e1092. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001092

Table 2.

Summary of separate parallel mediation analyses for each disability measure with change in pain catastrophizing scale, fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire, and arthritis self-efficacy scale mediating the effects of change in pain intensity on change in functional disability.

IV Total effect (path c) Direct effect (path c') Indirect effect* ES St. indirect effect DV
Model 1
 ΔPCS (M1) 1.11 (0.39, 1.83) 0.35 (−0.39, 1.10) 0.37 (0.07, 0.82) 33% 0.12
 ΔFABQ (M2) 1.11 (0.39, 1.83) 0.35 (−0.39, 1.10) 0.13 (−0.17, 0.45) 12% 0.04
 ΔASES (M3) 1.11 (0.39, 1.83) 0.35 (−0.39, 1.10) 0.26 (−0.08, 0.66) 24% 0.09 ΔWSAS (n = 69)
Model 2
 ΔPCS (M1) 0.63 (0.18, 1.09) 0.18 (−0.29, 0.67) −0.02 (−0.19, 0.18) 3% −0.01
 ΔFABQ (M2) 0.63 (0.18, 1.09) 0.18 (−0.29, 0.67) 0.20 (0.01, 0.47) 32% 0.11
 ΔASES (M3) 0.63 (0.18, 1.09) 0.18 (−0.29, 0.67) 0.25 (0.04, 0.55) 40% 0.13 ΔPFS (n = 69)
Model 3
 ΔPCS (M1) 0.23 (−0.05, 0.52) −0.04 (−0.35, 0.28) 0.00 (−0.08, 0.08) 0% 0.00
 ΔFABQ (M2) 0.23 (−0.05, 0.52) −0.04 (−0.35, 0.28) 0.10 (−0.02, 0.22) 43% 0.08
 ΔASES (M3) 0.23 (−0.05, 0.52) −0.04 (−0.35, 0.28) 0.17 (0.01, 0.36) 74% 0.15 ΔBPS (n = 61)
*

The indirect effect quantifies how much 2 cases that differ by one unit on pain intensity (∆API) are estimated to differ on disability (∆WSAS, ∆PFS, and ∆BPS) through each putative mediator; ES = ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect as a measure of effect size.

95% confidence interval that does not include 0.

ASES, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale; BPS, back performance scale; DV, dependent variable; FABQ, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire; IV, independent variable; Mx, mediator(s); PCS, pain catastrophizing scale; PFS, physical functioning scale; WSAS, Work and Social Adjustment Scale.