Table 2:
First Author | Main Findings |
---|---|
Bots et al., 1997 88 | Odds ratio of 0.163mm increase in IMT with stroke was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.82), myocardial infarction was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.78) When subjects with a previous myocardial infarction or stroke were excluded, odds ratios were 1.57 (95% CI, 1.27 to 1.94) for stroke and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.92) for myocardial infarction. |
Urbina et al., 2002 91 | Race differences (blacks more than whites) were noted for the common carotid (p <0.001) and carotid bulb (bifurcation) IMT (women only, p <0.001). Men had a greater IMT in the common carotid (p <0.05), internal carotid (p <0.05), and carotid bulb (whites only, p <0.001). |
Berry et al., 2009 89 | In young adults with a low 10 year risk, the IMT of common carotid (0.83mm) and internal carotid (0.85mm) was higher in high lifetime risk compared to low lifetime risk groups |
Polak et al., 2010 94 | Carotid IMT was associated with LDL cholesterol, smoking and hypertension in all segments while CCA was associated strongly with fasting glucose and diastolic blood pressure and hypertension, diabetes and current smoking with bulb IMT, and LDL with ICA IMT |
Nwabuo et al., 2020 99 | Carotid IMT has also been shown to be associated with variability of blood pressure due to the shear stress on the arterial scaffold resulting endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and oxidative stress leading arterial remodeling |
Wilkins et al., 2014 | Family history of CVD was associated with carotid IMT >90% with an OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.10-3.4. |
Raynor et al., 2013 | Lipid levels at young age have been shown to predict carotid IMT abnormalities in middle age. More than carotid stenosis, plaque area and volume showed greater association with traditional risk factors. |
McMahan et al., 2005 22 | Odds ratios for a 1-unit increase in the risk scores were 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.22) for the CAC and 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.35) for the abdominal aorta. |
Jurgens et al., 2021 114 | AAC scores tended to be much higher than CAC scores. AAC scores were higher in Black women than in White women. AAC predicted CVD with HR 1.77 (1.52– 2.06). AAC predicted incident CVD when CAC was 0. |
Szulc, 2016 116 | People with any or more advanced AAC had higher risk of cardiovascular events (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.40-2.39), fatal cardiovascular events (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.44-2.39), and all-cause mortality (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.55-2.53) |
Abbreviations: CI- confidence interval; IMT- intima-media thickness; CCA- common carotid artery; ICA-internal carotid artery;LDL-low-density lipoprotein; CBF-cerebral blood flow; AAC-abdominal aorta calcification; CAC-coronary artery calcification; CVD- cardiovascular disease; HR- hazard ratio;RR-relative risk;