Table 2.
Evaluation indicator system for PERR mode selection of traditional village.
| Target layer | First-level | Serial No. | Second-level indicators |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mode Selection of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction of traditional village (G) | The value of Traditional village cultural heritage (A) | A1 | Protection level of traditional villages |
| A2 | Relevance to significant historical events, revolutionary movements, and famous figures | ||
| A3 | Importance of ethnic culture | ||
| A4 | The uniqueness of ethnic and local characteristics | ||
| A5 | Representativeness of traditional village’s regional architectural style and spatial layout | ||
| A6 | Uniqueness of local materials and craftsmanship | ||
| A7 | Presence of inheritor of ethnic, cultural heritage | ||
| Post-disaster situation of traditional village (B) | B1 | Integrity of traditional buildings and historical environment post-disaster | |
| B2 | Authenticity of the village | ||
| B3 | Scale of the village | ||
| B4 | Integrity of public facilities post-disaster | ||
| Social capital of traditional village (C) | C1 | Mutual assistance and altruistic behavior within the village’s interpersonal relationship | |
| C2 | Influence and appeal of grassroots village organizations | ||
| C3 | Influence of village elites | ||
| C4 | Trust and emotional stability of villagers | ||
| C5 | Execution capability of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) | ||
| C6 | Support for mobilizing private capital | ||
| Management and policy support in PERR (D) | D1 | Social impact of the disaster | |
| D2 | Policy support and guarantee for post-disaster reconstruction and rural revitalization | ||
| D3 | Fairness of government policies | ||
| D4 | Post-disaster execution of government departments | ||
| D5 | Level of support from government reconstruction funds | ||
| D6 | Trust of affected people in the government | ||
| Physical geography and environmental condition (E) | E1 | Permissibility of geological hazard environment | |
| E2 | Accessibility of transportation | ||
| E3 | Availability of land resources for reconstruction needs | ||
| E4 | Ecological value of the village environment | ||
| Development prospects and benefits (F) | F1 | Significant improvement in villagers’ living standards | |
| F2 | Significant increase in villagers’ happiness index | ||
| F3 | Influence on the surrounding areas | ||
| F4 | Reflection of heritage conservation value | ||
| F5 | Value of village cultural tourism and future development planning potential |