Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol Methods. 2015 May 7;424:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.04.017

Table 1.

Comparison of “Ideal” ligand binding assay system proposed by Spriggs et al.,2 and the automated Simoa instrument presented here.

Platform Attribute Measure of Success (Sprigg et al. AAPS J., 2012)2 Automated Simoa performance
Sensitivity Capable of quantifying low analyte concentrations of drug and biomarkers in a variety of matrices 1000-fold more sensitive than standard immunoassaysa,3,8 fg/mL sensitivitya
Dynamic Range Greater than 3 log range >4 log rangea,11
Precision Less than 2% variability for the instrument signal of internal standard 4.2% variability in AEBa
Ruggedness Consistent performance under varied laboratory conditions Full automation has the potential to minimize lab-to-lab variabilityc
Tolerance to biological interferences Standard immunoassay approaches to reduce interferences8
Total Assay time Results in 1 h or less Time to first result = 83 mina (45 min also demonstrated)b
Multiplexing Should have capabilities 6-plex immunoassay demonstrated;a 10-plex decoding demonstratedb
Minimal cross-talk due to detection mechanisms Optical cross-talk <0.1%14
Flexibility/throughput Automation compatible Fully automateda
Capable of assay miniaturization (e.g., 384+ well plates or other substrate) 96-well plates and primary tubes as sample inputa
Utilization of various solid supports Standard immobilization chemistries compatible with beadsa
Ability to run in low and high throughput environments Yesa
Possible to use throughout the life cycle of drug development Yes. Available for researchers, contract-research organizations, and under development for regulatory approvala
Multi-modality Measure wide variety of therapeutics including proteins, peptides, antibodies, etc. Proteins,a antibodies,b DNA18 demonstrated
Life Cycle Support Multiple sources for reagent availability Yes. Many commercial sources of antibody pairs.8
Ability to label reagents in-house Yes. Open platform via “homebrew” kits.a
a

This work.

b

Unpublished work.

c

Not tested in this work.