Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;11:1254632. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1254632

TABLE 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions. a

graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2023-1254632_wc_tfx1.jpg
Entry 1a (equiv) 2a (equiv) Base (equiv) Yield b (3b/N1/3b′) (%)
1 1.5 1.0 Cs2CO3 (2.0) trace/trace/trace
2 1.5 1.0 NaOtBu (2.0) 48/17/9
3 1.5 1.0 DBU (2.0) 38/trace/trace
4 1.5 1.0 NaH (2.0) 51/13/12
5 1.5 1.0 KOtBu (2.0) 26/9/5
6 1.5 1.0 LiOtBu (2.0) 48/3/7
7 1.0 1.0 LiOtBu (1.2) 46/6/4
8 1.0 1.0 LiOtBu (1.5) 49/5/4
9 1.0 1.0 LiOtBu (1.8) 55/5/5
10 1.0 1.0 LiOtBu (2.0) 57/5/4
11 1.0 1.0 LiOtBu (2.5) 55/4/4
12 1.0 1.5 LiOtBu (2.0) 73/8/trace
13 1.0 2.0 LiOtBu (2.0) 82/8/trace
14 c 1.0 2.0 LiOtBu (2.0) 18/2/trace
15 d 1.0 2.0 LiOtBu (2.0) trace/trace/trace
16 1.0 2.0 no base trace/trace/trace

Entry 13 was selected as an optimal condition.

a

Reaction conditions: 1a or 2a was used as a limiting reagent (0.1 mmol for 1.0 equiv) in DMSO (1.0 mL) under N2 atmosphere at rt for 20 h.

b

NMR, yields were measured with the caffeine as an internal standard.

c

DMF, was used instead of DMSO.

d

THF, was used instead of DMSO.