. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 15.

Published in final edited form as: Addit Manuf. 2023 Jul;73:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103688. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2023.103688

Table 3.

$D_{p}$ and $E_{c}$ values caculated from working curves (WC) prepared at 2.4 mW cm⁻² and 20 mW cm⁻² 365 nm light, compared with $D_{p}$ values calculated from UV–vis optical absorbance measurements at 365 nm.

Method		$D_{p}$ (μm)			$E_{c}$ (mJ cm⁻²)
Method		WC @ 2.4 mW cm⁻²	WC @ 20 mW cm⁻²	UV–vis Abs	WC @ 2.4 mW cm⁻²	WC @ 20 mW cm⁻²

9,10-DPA	PPO	150 ± 10	143 ± 5	172 (± 2% S.D.)	18 ± 6	21 ± 4
	No PPO	149 ± 7	–	–	25 ± 6	–
POPOP	PPO	35 ± 2	43 ± 2	33 (± 2 % S.D.)	8 ± 3	10 ± 3
	No PPO	40 ± 2	–	–	12 ± 3	–
SFS	PPO	31 ± 2	28 ± 2	26 (± 2% S.D.)	37 ± 10	22 ± 9
	No PPO	25 ± 2	–	–	17 ± 7	–