Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):e075363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075363

Table 2.

An overview of data collection methods for the process evaluation

Data collection Setting (COVID-19 adaptation) Timing Quantities Aims (objectives) Data collection informed by Analysis method
Observations Training at intervention services Inpatient and community (observe via video call) As training is delivered Inpatient and community combined: ~1 hour each session, 2–3 sessions per service Intervention delivery and engagement (objectives 2, 3, 4) Observational framework listing intervention components and behaviours expected if delivered with fidelity. Descriptive summaries, using MRC framework
Baseline at intervention and control services Inpatient and community (staff telephone conversations) Before intervention delivery Inpatient: ~5 visits (20 hours) including ~3 therapy sessions, per service.
Community: ~3 therapy sessions per service
Understand usual practice at the service, including how staff support standing and moving (objectives 2, 4) Researcher fieldnotes, informed by Spradley’s descriptive question matrix.25 Thematic analysis
Time points 1, 2 and 3 at intervention services Inpatient and community (staff telephone conversations) 1–2 months,
4–5 months
and 8–9 months after starting trial recruitment
Inpatient: ~8 visits (32 hours) including ~3 therapy sessions, per service. Community: ~3 therapy sessions per service Fidelity of intervention delivery, and influencing factors (objectives 1, 2, 3, 4) Observational framework listing behaviours and intervention use expected if delivered with fidelity.
Researcher fieldnotes, informed by Spradley’s descriptive question matrix.25
Thematic analysis
Time points 1 and 2 at control services Inpatient and community (staff telephone conversations) 2–3 months
and 6–7 months after starting trial recruitment
Inpatient: ~5 visits (20 hours) including ~3 therapy sessions, per service. Community: ~3 therapy sessions per service Understand usual practice at the service, including how staff support standing and moving, and differences/similarities with intervention services (objective 4) Researcher fieldnotes, informed by Spradley’s descriptive question matrix.25 Thematic analysis
Documentary analysis intervention services (time points 1, 2 and 3) Inpatient and community (in patients home if unable to attend wards) Alongside intervention service observations Complete documentary analysis form observation time points 1, 2 and 3 Capture use and delivery (adherence and compliance) of intervention components (eg, stroke patient use of intervention components) (objective 2) Documentary analysis form informed by fidelity expectations. Descriptive summaries
Semistructured interviews Patients who had a stroke (and carers) at intervention services Patients’ own home (telephone or video call) ~4–6 months after service started the intervention Inpatient and community combined: n=5 per service Explore patient who had a stroke and carer experiences and views of standing and moving after stroke. Explore intervention use, acceptability, impact and barriers/facilitators. (objectives 1, 2, 3, 4) Topic guide informed by normalisation process theory23 and the intervention acceptability framework.24 Framework analysis
Staff at intervention services Inpatient and community setting (telephone or video call) Shortly after service stops using the intervention Inpatient and community combined: n=10 per service (including two senior) Explore views on supporting standing and moving after stroke. Explore staff views of the intervention and barriers/ facilitators for embedding and sustaining the intervention (objectives 1, 2, 3, 4) Topic guide informed by normalisation process theory23 and the intervention acceptability framework.24 Framework analysis
Patients who had a stroke (and carers) at control services Community (telephone or video call) ~6 months after trial recruitment starts Inpatient and community combined: n=5 per service Explore patient who had a stroke and carer experiences and views of standing and moving after stroke (objective 4). Topic guide informed by, normalisation process theory23 and the intervention acceptability framework.24 Framework analysis
Staff at control services Inpatient and community (telephone or video call) ~9–12 months after starting trial recruitment Inpatient and community combined: n=6 per service (including one senior) Explore staff views on supporting standing and moving after stroke (objective 4) Topic guide informed by normalisation process theory23 and the intervention acceptability framework.24 Framework analysis

MRC, Medical Research Council.