Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;43(3):202–209. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab738

Table 1.

Associations between potential triggers and ischaemic stroke, stratified by Aetiological and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classificationsa

Anger or emotional upset
Heavy physical exertion
Prevalence OR (99% CI) P int Prevalence OR (99% CI) P int
Overall 9.2% (1233) 1.22 (1.00–1.49) 5.3% (708) 0.89 (0.69–1.14)
Aetiological classification
 Large vessel 8.2% (174) 0.67 (0.42–1.08) <0.001 4.7% (99) 0.62 (0.37–1.03) 0.166
 Small vessel 7.0% (278) 1.05 (0.73–1.51) 4.0% (162) 0.85 (0.55–1.32)
 Cardioembolic 12.5% (150) 1.47 (0.88–2.43) 5.8% (69) 1.36 (0.69–2.69)
 Other 12.5% (96) 2.53 (1.30–4.90) 3.2% (25) 0.75 (0.25–2.21)
OCSP classification
 Total anterior circulation 9.0% (60) 1.76 (0.79–3.93) 0.720 4.5% (30) 0.83 (0.28–2.50) 0.427
 Partial anterior circulation 8.6% (416) 0.99 (0.73–1.34) 4.6% (224) 1.03 (0.71–1.50)
 Posterior circulation 10.4% (155) 1.41 (0.87–2.29) 5.0% (75) 0.48 (0.26–0.89)
 Lacunar 7.7% (213) 1.32 (0.87–2.02) 4.0% (110) 1.01 (0.61–1.67)

CI, confidence interval; OCSP, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; OR, odds ratio.

a

Adjusted for other trigger (heavy physical exertion or anger/emotional upset) and interaction between heavy physical exertion and anger/emotional upset in case period.