Table 5.
Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies
| Studies | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | ||
| Schoolcraft (2010) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8/9 | |
| Forman (2012) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/9 | ||
| Schoolcraft (2013) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
| Lee (2015) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8/9 | |
| Kang (2016) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/7 | ||
| Whitney (2016) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
| Coates (2017) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7/9 | |
| Liss (2018) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8/9 | |
| Lee (2019) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6/9 | ||
| Sato (2019) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8/9 | |