Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 21;53(10):1905–1929. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01867-4

Table 5.

Summary of validity and reliability evidence for each instrument

Instrument (alphabetical order) Evidence for n validity aspects 1. Test content 2. Response processes 3. Internal structure 4. Relations with other variables 5. Consequences evidence
Content validity (literature review/prior instruments) Content validity (experts) Face validity Internal consistency Test–retest and/or interrater reliability Construct validity Age Sex Motor   skill Physical   literacy   Time Screening potential
1. Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire (APLQ) 3–4  ~  -
2. Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL) 1  ~  - - - - - - - - - -
3. Canadian Assessment for Physical Literacy (CAPL) version 2 Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA) 2–3 - -  ~  - - - -
Motivation/confidence 2 - - x - - - - -
CAPL version 2 4  ~  - - - -
4. IPLA Physical Literacy Charting Tool 1  ~  - - - - - - - - - -
5. Passport for Life (PFL) 3–4  ~   ~   ~  - - - -
6. Physical Literacy self-Assessment Questionnaire (PLAQ) 1–2 - - - - - - - - - -
Physical Literacy Assessment for Youth instruments (PLAY) 7.basic 1–2 - - - x - - - -
8.coach 0 - - - - - - - - - - - -
9.fun 2 - - - - - -
10.self 1 - - - - - x - - - -
11. Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) 3–4 -  ~  - - - -
12. Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) 3–4 -  ~  - - - -
13. Perceived Physical Literacy Inventory (PPLI) 2 - - - - - x - - - -
14. Perceptions of Physical Literacy for Middle-School Students (PPLMS) 3–4 - - - - - - - -

✓ met this aspect of validity evidence, - not reported, x reported but not considered to meet the criteria, i.e., poor value reported, ~ partially considered to meet criteria, IPLA International Physical Literacy Association