Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 15;13:15300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42138-6

Table 2.

Summary of non-wear in wellness study according to different methods of detection.

Median Mean ± SD Range Median Excluding Missing Data) Mean/SD (Excluding Missing Data) Range (Excluding Missing Data)
Participant-level statistics (Aggregated per Participant) (n = 95 participants)
% Non-wear: GT9X-Link Wear Sensor 13.04 16.32 ± 11.40 0–55.44 17.90 22.39 ± 16.16 3.83–86.19
% Non-wear: Choi 9.66 13.78 ± 12.71 0–56.60 12.78 20.28 ± 19.21 0.94–85.54
% Non-wear: Troiano 12.34 16.62 ± 12.79 0–58.64 18.63 23.67 ± 18.94 1.58–86.39
% Non-wear: van Hees 7.11 12.43 ± 12.62 0–55.35 9.04 18.56 ± 19.29 0.52–85.53
% Non-wear: Majority algorithm 7.79 12.50 ± 12.46 0–55.75 9.71 18.63 ± 19.06 0.80–85.66
% Non-wear: Majority algorithm (3) 8.41 12.73 ± 12.54 0 – 55.97 9.82 18.95 ± 19.20 0.80–85.74
Day-level statistics (Aggregated Across Entire Study) (n = 31,175)
% Non-wear: : GT9X-Link Wear Sensor 0.90 16.29 ± 28.85 0–100 3.19 20.08 ± 31.00 0–100
% Non-wear: Choi 0.00 13.86 ± 26.65 0–100 0.00 17.03 ± 28.78 0–100
% Non-wear: Troiano 4.86 16.74 ± 26.65 0–100 8.13 20.53 ± 28.34 0–100
% Non-wear: van Hees 0.00 12.55 ± 26.98 0–100 0.00 15.42 ± 29.32 0–100
% Non-wear: Majority algorithm 0.00 12.58 ± 26.24 0–100 0.00 15.48 ± 28.47 0–100
% Non-wear: Majority algorithm (3) 0.00 12.82 ± 26.60 0–100 0.00 15.77 ± 28.85 0–100