Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 16;19:85. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00841-z

Table 4.

Summary of included studies

Study Type of work Location Sample Size / Cohort IG type Study period Study Design/Analysis
Alcantara et al. (2021) [32] Journal article Single site in Toronto, Ontario 34 patients with generalized MG IVIG & SCIG 2015–2020 Retrospective cohort study
Arnold et al. (2020) [50] Journal article Canada-wide 74 patients with ITP IVIG vs eltrombopag 2013–2019 Clinical trial (randomized, open-label)(Bridging ITP Trial)
Bourque et al. (2016) [31] Journal article Single site in Ottawa, Ontario 9 patients with MG IVIG & SCIG 2015–2016 Retrospective cohort study
Brownlee et al. (2022) [48] Journal article Single site in Ottawa, Montreal 10 patients with PID or SID who did not tolerate the side effects of 20% SCIG SCIG 2018–2020 Prospective cohort
Fu et al. (2018) [35]a Journal article Single site in Toronto, Ontario 57 PID patients SCIG & IVIG Study published in 2018- Cost savings study
Gerth et al. (2014) [34]a Journal article N/A PID/SID patients IVIG & SCIG N/A Cost savings simulation study
Hsia et al. (2015) [27] Journal article Two hospitals in Ontario 383 adult patients with ITP IVIG 2003–2012 Retrospective audit
Jutras et al. (2021) [26] Journal article Single site in Montréal Québec 172 critically ill pediatric patients IVIG 2013–2018 Retrospective cohort study
Kaur et al. (2022) [51] Journal article Canada-wide 74 patients with ITP IVIG vs eltrombopag 2013–2019 Cost-effectiveness analysis of data from Bridging ITP Trial
Keith et al. (2022) [46]a Journal article 6 centers across Canada (except Québec) 125 Patients with PID or SID SCIG 2018–2020 Phase 4, non-interventional, prospective, single-arm study
Kobayashi et al. (2022) [47]a Journal article Multi-national, including Canada 102 patients with PID SCIG 238 weeks follow-up duration. Dates were not mentioned Secondary analysis of data from previous single-arm phase 3 trials
Liu et al. (2019) [28] Journal article Single site in Toronto, Ontario 40 patients with ITP IVIG 2014 Audit
Mallick et al. (2022) [41]a Journal article Canada-wide 296 Patients with PID or SID SCIG & IVIG 2020–2021 Survey Study
Murphy et al. (2019) [17] Journal article Four sites in Ottawa, Ontario 2629 patients IVIG 2007–2016 Trend Analysis
Reid et al. (2014) [37] Journal article Referral centers or community hospitals in Ontario 169 patients who were on hospital-based IG replacement therapy IVIG & SCIG Survey using questionnaire
Ritchie et al. (2022) [36]a Journal article Alberta, Province-wide 7890 adult and pediatric patients who used IG products SCIG & IVIG 2012–2019 Retrospective population-based cohort
Shih et al. (2017) [9] Journal article Four sites in Ontario 178 adult patients IVIG 2014 Audit
Sholapur et al. (2016) [38] Journal article Single site in Ontario 12 ITP patients IVIG Study published in 2016- Cross-sectional study
Suleman et al. (2019) [33]a Journal article Single site in Ottawa, Ontario 19 patients with immune-mediated neurological disorders IVIG & SCIG 2010–2016 Retrospective cohort study
Sultan et al. (2017) [39]a Journal article Single site in Montreal, Québec 60 children with PID SCIG Study published in 2017- Cross-sectional study
Tran et al. (2023) [29] Journal article Three hospitals in British Columbia 114 patients with SID SCIG & IVIG 2018–2019 Retrospective cohort/audit
Walter et al (2014) [45] Journal article Manitoba, province-wide 62 patients with PID SCIG 2007–2018 Retrospective
Abadeh et al. (2023) [49] Conference abstract Ontario, multicentre 108 patients with SID IVIG/SCIG 2020–2022 Cross-sectional
Furlan et al. (2016) [52] Conference abstract Ontario 32 patients who received IVIG and 38 patients treated with plasma exchange IVIG 2007–2010 Cost-minimization analysis
Mallon et al. (2016) [43] Conference abstract Alberta, multicentre 8 patients with MG SCIG Clinical trial
Shabani-Rad et al. (2018) [30] Conference abstract Calgary, Alberta IVIG recipients IVIG 2017 Cross-sectional
Siddiqi et al. (2018) [44] Conference abstract Alberta, multicentre 822 patients with MG SCIG Clinical trial
Streu et al (2016) [42] Conference abstract Manitoba, single centre 53 patients with CLL SCIG Two year period Prospective
Zhou et al. (2021) [40] Conference abstract Ontario, single centre Adult patients receiving IVIG for Inflammatory Myositis IVIG/SCIG Survey

IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; SCIG: subcutaneous immunoglobulin; MG: myasthenia gravis; ITP: immune thrombocytopenia; PID: primary immune deficiency; SID: secondary immune deficiency. The key findings of the publications in this table can be found in Additional file 1: Table S3

aStudies were funded by IVIG/SCIG manufacturers. Fu et al., Gerth et al., Mallick et al., Ritchie et al., Suleman et al., and Sultan et al. were funded by CSL Behring. Keith et al. were funded by Baxalta US Inc. and Baxalta Innovations GmBH. Kobayashi et al. was funded by Octapharma AG