Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 19;27(7):2158–2172. doi: 10.1177/13623613231154349

Table 4.

General dominance analysis weight and rank values for predictors of social QATs in the discovery sample and the replication sample.

Predictors Discovery sample Replication sample
M [95% CI] Sig M [95% CI] Sig
Weights
 Auditory 0.09 [0.04, 0.16] 95% 0.14 [0.07, 0.21] 94%
 Tactile 0.07 [0.03, 0.12] 87% 0.05 [0.01, 0.11] 32%
 Proprioception 0.07 [0.03, 0.11] 89%
 DCD 0.02 [0.00, 0.06] 7%
 Mood conditions 0.04 [0.01, 0.09] 32%
 Male 0.01 [0.00, 0.03] 1% 0.03 [0.00, 0.07] 9%
R2 0.30 [0.21, 0.39] 0.22 [0.14, 0.32]
Ranks
 Auditory 1.55 [1.00, 4.00] 1.03 [1.00, 2.00]
 Tactile 2.38 [1.00, 4.00] 2.29 [2.00, 4.00]
 Proprioception 2.56 [1.00, 4.00]
 DCD 5.09 [3.00, 7.00]
 Mood conditions 3.93 [2.00, 6.00]
 Male 5.78 [4.00, 7.00] 2.96 [2.00, 4.00]

QAT: quantitative autistic trait; DCD: developmental coordination disorder; M: mean; CI: confidence interval; Sig: proportion of runs that the predictor was found to be significantly different from zero (i.e. the spurious predictor).

The spurious predictor used to test for significant differences from zero was excluded from the table. Mean represents the average value across all simulated runs, and all values were based on 1000 simulated runs.