Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 16;14:5763. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41488-z

Fig. 10. Comparison of NMR-predicted binding to predictions by AlphaFold2-Multimer and AutoDock CrankPep.

Fig. 10

ac Top panels: Ribbon diagrams showing the predicted poses of indicated peptides bound to CCL5. Chemokines are in grey, and the peptide poses in colour, with the top-ranked pose coloured green. Bottom panels: Corresponding heatmaps of weighted proximity scores mapped onto ribbon diagrams of CCL5. Chemokine structural features (α-helix, β-strands and 30s loop) are indicated. a Poses obtained following the previously reported HADDOCK76 analysis of NMR chemical shift perturbation data of peptide Ev4E14N31 (Ev4Glu14-Asn31, EEEDDYTAYAPLTAYFTN) in complex with CCL528. b, c Poses obtained following AlphaFold2-Multimer (AFM) and AutoDock CrankPep (ADCP) analysis respectively of peptide HD2 (EEDDYTAYAPLTCYFT) docked to CCL5. d Heatmap scale for weighted proximity score. NMR nuclear magnetic resonance, AFM AlphaFold2-Multimer, ADCP AutoDock CrankPep, N N-terminus of the top-ranked pose, β1, β3: β-strands, α α-helix. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.