表 3.
西维来司他钠治疗与COVID-19相关ARDS重症患者临床结局之间的关系
Association between sivelestat sodium administration and clinical outcomes ofARDS patients with COVID-19
Clinical outcomes | Total | Control group | Sivelestat group | P | HR (95% CI) |
PSM; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval; ICU: Intensive care unit. aCox regression was used for estimating the impact of Sivelestat sodium use on mortality outcomes adjusting for confounding variables selected based on P < 0.05 in univariate analysis and potential confounders judged by the clinical expertise of our team, including age, gender, APACHE Ⅱ score, mechanical ventilation, CRRT, CRP, PCT, IL-6. bLinear regression was used to evaluate the association between Sivelestat sodium use and length of stay. HR was calculated using the formula HR=eβ. | |||||
Before PSM | n=199 | n=164 | n=35 | ||
Survival rate [n (%)]a | 103 (51.8) | 88 (53.7) | 15 (42.9) | 0.81 | 1.08 (0.56, 2.10) |
Length of ICU stayb | 10.11 [5.15, 18.26] | 10.00 [4.93, 16.30] | 14.27 [7.80, 25.44] | 0.22 | 1.57 (0.87, 2.57) |
Length of hospital stayb | 19.76 [11.14, 31.65] | 17.53 [10.90, 32.20] | 24.61 [13.75, 30.94] | 0.2 | 1.42 (0.76, 1.73) |
After PSM | n=105 | n=70 | n=35 | ||
Survival rate [n (%)]a | 42 (40.0) | 27 (38.6) | 15 (42.9) | 0.36 | 1.36 (0.70, 2.62) |
Length of ICU stayb | 12.91 [7.01, 21.63] | 12.84 [6.96, 20.55] | 14.27 [7.80, 25.44] | 0.39 | 1.68 (0.49, 2.45) |
Length of hospital stayb | 21.02 [10.91, 33.35] | 19.71 [10.76, 33.36] | 24.61 [13.75, 30.94] | 0.68 | 1.20 (0.63, 2.35) |