Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 18;8:355. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01578-2

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Rox promotes Mor-CPP extinction and inhibits Mor-CPP reinstatement. a The paradigm of Mor-CPP formation, extinction and reinstatement. As described in Methods section (Pattern 1), the CPP established mouse was trained to extinct, Rox was administrated instate of morphine after postconditioning phase for 3 cycles and a single Rox injection was conducted 6 h before reinstatement test. b Time spent in drug-paired box in Mor-CPP formation and extinction periods. Rox (10 mg/kg) promoted extinction of Mor-CPP as indicated by faster reduction in CPP scores (Veh, Mor and Rox, n = 10; group, F(2,135) = 24.26, P < 0.0001; period, F(4,135) = 4.217, P = 0.0030; group × period, F(8,135) = 3.894, P = 0.0004). c Saline injection did not induce reinstatement of Mor-CPP (Veh, Mor and Rox, n = 10; F(2,27) = 0.1959, P = 0.8232). d Mor (5 mg/kg) triggered Mor-CPP reinstatement, whereas it was inhibited by Rox (10 mg/kg) treatment (Veh, Mor and Rox, n = 10; F(2,27) = 7.725, P = 0.0022). e The paradigm of Mor-CPP formation, extinction and reinstatement. As described in Methods section (Pattern 2), the mouse, CPP well established, was trained to extinct by repeat preference tests for 5 consecutive days, Rox was administrated instate of morphine after postconditioning phase for 3 cycles and a single Rox injection was conducted 6 h before reinstatement test. f Mor group was divided into Mor1 and Mor2 groups. Time spent in Mor-paired box in CPP formation and extinction periods (Veh, n = 12; Mor1, n = 14; Mor2, n = 12; group, F(2,245) = 1.862, P = 0.1576; period, F(6,245) = 2.431, P = 0.0266; group × period, F(12,245) = 1.173, P = 0.3030). g Saline injection did not induce reinstatement of Mor-CPP (Veh, n = 8; Mor1, n = 9; Mor2, n = 8; group, F(2,22) = 0.4210, P = 0.6616). h Mor (5 mg/kg) successfully triggered Mor-CPP reinstatement, whereas it was inhibited by Rox (10 mg/kg) treatment (Veh, Mor and Rox, n = 8; F(2,21) = 7.110, P = 0.0044). Values are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical analyses for b, f and and for c, d, g and h were performed using two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni-corrected tests, respectively. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 Mor or Mor1 vs Veh; ^^P < 0.01, ^^^P < 0.001 Rox or Mor2 vs. Veh; $P < 0.05 Mor vs Rox; NS: not significant. Veh: vehicle; Sal: saline