Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 6;11(25):5857–5862. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5857

Table 1.

Studies reporting the peri-device leak after left atrial appendage closure

Ref.
Study population
Type of study
Type of LAA closure
Incidence of PDL
Findings
Holmes et al[8] 485 Randomized controlled study Watchman 14%: ≥ 5 mm No difference between patients with any PDL in terms of primary effectiveness
Dukkipati et al[12] 1205 Randomized controlled study Watchman 0.7%: > 5 mm; 27.7%: 1-5 mm; and 71.6%: no PDL PDL ≤ 5 mm was associated with an increased risk of stroke, systemic embolism, cardiovascular, unexplained death, or all-cause mortality
Korsholm et al[13] 153 Retrospective study Amplatzer Amulet, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug 61% PDL did not increase the incidence of events related to thromboembolism.
Wang et al[14] 152 Retrospective study LAmbre 15.7%: > 3 mm PDL was not associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events
Alkhouli et al[15] 51333 Retrospective studies Watchman, ACP 73.4%: no PDL; 25.8%: moderate; and 0.7%: severe Patients with PDL at 1 yr had a 2-fold increase in ischemic stroke/SE at 5 yr compared with patients without PDL
Miller et al[17] 43 Retrospective study Watchman FLX More than 40% 3 TIAs (6.98%) and 3 strokes (6.98%) were documented each within the 6-mo to 1-yr period

TIA: Transient ischemic attack; PDL: Peri-device leak; SE: Systemic embolization; LAA: Left atrial appendage.