Table 3.
Growth performance, cecal lesion scores, and survival rate of chicks in different groups.
Group | BW (g) | BWG (g) | FI (g) | FCR (g/g) | Cecal lesion scores | Survival rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 138.25a | 55.88a | 116.81a | 2.09b | 0d | 100 |
C | 114.04c | 31.11c | 94.46b | 3.08a | 2.87a | 87.5 |
D | 136.58a | 53.68a | 114.32a | 2.13b | 0.83c | 100 |
M | 128.88b | 46.94b | 107.81a | 2.30b | 1.33b | 100 |
SEM | 3.012 | 3.025 | 2.951 | 0.136 | 0.172 | |
P-value | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
“Note: Different superscript letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). Data are presented as mean.” was revised to “Note: Different superscript letters(a-d) differ significantly (P < 0.05). Data are presented as mean.”