Table 4.
PFAS Binding | fup | fub | Clin vitro (μl/min*106 cells) | Clhepatic (L/hr) | Css (μM) | fup Fold-Difference | Css Fold-Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum fup | 0.0001 | 0.00018 | 0 | 0.0000 | 5710.51 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 0.0057 | 1000.23 | 1 | 6 | |||
10 | 0.0191 | 342.05 | 1 | 17 | |||
| |||||||
25th percentile fup | 0.0018 | 0.00327 | 0 | 0.0000 | 317.25 | 18 | 18 |
3 | 0.1033 | 55.62 | 18 | 103 | |||
10 | 0.3434 | 19.07 | 18 | 299 | |||
| |||||||
Median fup | 0.005 | 0.00909 | 0 | 0.0000 | 114.21 | 50 | 50 |
3 | 0.2864 | 20.06 | 50 | 285 | |||
10 | 0.9475 | 6.91 | 50 | 827 | |||
| |||||||
75th percentile fup | 0.04 | 0.07273 | 0 | 0.0000 | 14.28 | 400 | 400 |
3 | 2.2410 | 2.55 | 400 | 2237 | |||
10 | 7.0599 | 0.92 | 400 | 6187 |
Css values were predicted using a generic TK model described previously (Wetmore et al., 2015), using 1mg/kg/day dose rate and TK inputs above. PFAS fup distributions calculated for test set. Blood:plasma ratio used to calculate fu in blood (fub); glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 6.71 L/hr used to estimate renal clearance (GFR*fub).