Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2023 May 15;36(6):870–881. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00003

Table 4.

Impact of PPB and Hepatic Clearance on PFAS Css Estimation

PFAS Binding fup fub Clin vitro (μl/min*106 cells) Clhepatic (L/hr) Css (μM) fup Fold-Difference Css Fold-Difference
Minimum fup 0.0001 0.00018 0 0.0000 5710.51 1 1
3 0.0057 1000.23 1 6
10 0.0191 342.05 1 17

25th percentile fup 0.0018 0.00327 0 0.0000 317.25 18 18
3 0.1033 55.62 18 103
10 0.3434 19.07 18 299

Median fup 0.005 0.00909 0 0.0000 114.21 50 50
3 0.2864 20.06 50 285
10 0.9475 6.91 50 827

75th percentile fup 0.04 0.07273 0 0.0000 14.28 400 400
3 2.2410 2.55 400 2237
10 7.0599 0.92 400 6187

Css values were predicted using a generic TK model described previously (Wetmore et al., 2015), using 1mg/kg/day dose rate and TK inputs above. PFAS fup distributions calculated for test set. Blood:plasma ratio used to calculate fu in blood (fub); glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 6.71 L/hr used to estimate renal clearance (GFR*fub).