Skip to main content
Federal Practitioner logoLink to Federal Practitioner
. 2023 Feb 23;40(Suppl 1):S40–S44. doi: 10.12788/fp.0365

Primary Hepatic Lymphoma: A Rare Form of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Liver

Robert T Tung a,, Johannes Heyns a
PMCID: PMC10506499  PMID: 37727830

Abstract

Background

Primary hepatic lymphoma is a rare, malignant lymphoma of the liver unlike the predominant lymph nodal or splenic involvement associated with other types of lymphoma. It is commonly associated with nonspecific symptoms and usually detected incidentally on imaging examination.

Case Presentation

An 84-year-old man was evaluated for upper back pain. Chest computed tomography showed multiple large lesions in the liver, leading to the diagnosis of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the liver. Within 2 weeks of detecting his liver mass, the patient developed hypercalcemia and hyperuricemia that led to rapid deterioration and admission for treatment. Further diagnostic testing was performed, and he was initiated on appropriate chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Primary hepatic lymphoma, a form of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the liver is a rare disease without specific clinical manifestations, biochemical indicators, or radiologic features except for space-occupying liver lesions. However, patients’ conditions can deteriorate rapidly at an advanced stage as demonstrated in this case, which highlights the importance of a high level of suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment.


Primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) is a rare, malignant lymphoma of the liver. It differs from the predominantly lymph nodal or splenic involvement associated with other types of lymphoma. It is usually detected incidentally on imaging examination, commonly computed tomography (CT), for nonspecific clinical presentation. However, it has important clinical implications for early diagnosis and treatment as indicated in our case.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 84-year-old man presented to the emergency department for evaluation of upper back pain. The patient had a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and was a former smoker. He had normal vital signs, an unremarkable physical examination, and a body mass index of 25. His laboratory studies showed a normal blood cell count and serum chemistry, including serum calcium level and α-fetoprotein, but mildly elevated liver function tests.

The patient’s chest CT angiography showed no evidence of thoracic aortic dissection, penetrating atherosclerotic ulceration, or pulmonary artery embolism. Besides emphysematous changes in the lung, the chest CT was within normal limits. Liver CT demonstrated several subtle, relatively low-density, space-occupying lesions in both lobes of his liver, the largest in the right lobe, measuring nearly 8 cm with a prominent, contrast-enhanced vessel at the periphery (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Axial Liver Computed Tomography Angiography

Asterisks indicate multiple, large hypo-dense lesions in the liver and a contrast-enhanced vessel at the periphery around a large lesion in the right lobe.

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed hepatomegaly (the liver measured up to 19.3 cm in craniocaudal length) and multiple, large intrahepatic space-occupying lesions, the largest measuring 9.9 cm × 9.5 cm in the right lobe, as well as multiple lesions in the inferior right and left lobe with enhancing capsules surrounding the hepatic lesions (Figure 2). The kidneys, pancreas, spleen, and biliary ducts showed no abnormalities.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Magnetic Resonance Images of the Abdomen

A, T2-weighted coronal image of liver lesions that indicate a relatively high T2 signal compared with the remainder of the hepatic parenchyma. B, T2-weighted axial image shows iso- to hyper-intense hepatic lesions. C, Contrast-enhanced, fatsaturated T1-weighted image shows minimal lesion enhancement.

An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of the liver was performed. Flow cytometry showed a monoclonal B-cell population that was mostly intermediate to large based on forward scattered light characteristics. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD20, BCL2, BCL6, and CD45 in the neoplastic cells. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), CD15, CD30, and CD10 were negative, as were cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and pan-melanoma. CD3 highlighted background T cells. Ki-67 highlighted a proliferative index of approximately 75%, and the MYC stain demonstrated 50% positivity. This was consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there was insufficient tissue on the MUM1-stained slide; therefore, it was inconclusive to distinguish a nongerminal center derived from germinal center–derived DLBCL.

Two weeks after the initial CT examination, the patient’s condition quickly deteriorated, and he was admitted for severe weakness with evidence of severe hypercalcemia, hyperuricemia, and renal insufficiency (Table). His lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a nonspecific marker of tissue turnover, was severely elevated at 1027 IU/L (reference range, 105-333 IU/L). The patient received calcitonin, zoledronic acid, IV fluid for hypercalcemia and acute renal insufficiency, and rasburicase for severe hyperuricemia.

TABLE.

Laboratory Values

Laboratory studies Results Reference range
Sodium, mEq/L 138 136–145
Potassium, mEq/L 3.7 3.5–5.0
Chlorine, mEq/L 96a 98–107
Carbon dioxide, mEq/L 28 22–31
Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL 28a 9–25
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.5a 0.7–1.3
Calcium, mg/dL 14.0a 8.4–10.4
Aspartate transaminase, U/L 58a 5–34
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L 26 8–40
Alkaline phosphate, U/L 211a 40–150
Total bilirubin, mg/dL 1 0.2–1.2
α-fetoprotein, ng/mL 1.6 1.0–8.8
D-dimer, ng/mL 429a < 243
Parathyroid hormone, pg/mL < 4a 8.7–77.7
a

Value not in reference range.

To get additional tissue for further tumor characterization, a repeat liver biopsy was performed along with other diagnostic tests, including head MRI, bone marrow biopsy, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) full-body positron emission tomography (PET). Repeat liver biopsy showed only necrotic debris with immunostaining positive for CD20 and negative for CD3. B-cell lymphomas tend to retain CD20 expression after necrosis, so the presence of CD20 staining was consistent with a necrotic tumor. Again, there was insufficient tissue on the MUM1-stained slide. Head MRI showed no evidence of tumor involvement. Full-body PET showed abnormally elevated standardized uptake value (SUV) of radioactive tracers in several areas: multifocal, large area uptake within both right (SUV, 19) and left (SUV, 24) hepatic lobe (Figure 3A), retroperitoneal lymph node (SUV, 3.9), and a right lateral pleuralbased nodule (SUV, 17.9) (Figure 3B). There was no uptake in the spleen, bone, mediastinum, or other parts of the lung. Attenuation CT obtained with PET again detected those lesions in the liver but also a new, right lateral subpleural-based mass (11 mm) that was not present on the initial CT obtained a month earlier. Bone marrow biopsy showed normocellular marrow without dysplasia nor morphologic or immunophenotypic evidence of lymphoma/leukemia.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Fused Computed and Positron Emission Tomography

A, Multiple, large lesions in the liver can be seen with increased radioactive tracer uptakes. B, Right, pleural-based lung lesion can be seen with increased radioactive tracer uptake.

The diagnosis was primary DLBCL of the liver with retroperitoneal lymph nodes and right lung metastasis. The patient was started on systemic chemotherapy of R-CHOP (rituximab with reduced cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).

DISCUSSION

Lymphoma is a tumor that originates from hematopoietic cells typically presented as a circumscribed solid tumor of lymphoid cells.1 Lymphomas are usually seen in the lymph nodes, spleen, blood, bone marrow, brain, gastrointestinal tract, skin, or other normal structures where lymphoreticular cells exist but very rarely in the liver.2 PHL is extremely rare due to the lack of abundant lymphoid tissue in the normal liver.3 It accounts for 0.4% of extra-nodal lymphomas and 0.016% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.46 The etiology of PHL is unknown but usually it develops in patients with previous liver disease: viral infection (hepatitis B and C, Epstein-Barr, and HIV), autoimmune disease, immunosuppression, or liver cirrhosis.57

The diagnosis of PHL can be challenging due to its rarity, vague clinical features, and nonspecific radiologic findings. The common presenting symptoms are usually vague and include abdominal pain or discomfort, fatigue, jaundice, weight loss, and fever.5 Liver biopsy is essential to its diagnosis. The disease course is usually indolent among most patients with PHL. In our case, the patient presented with upper back pain but his condition deteriorated rapidly, likely due to the advanced stage of the disease. Diagnosis of liver lymphoma depends on a liver biopsy that should be compatible with the lymphoma. The criteria for diagnosis of PHL defined by Lei include (1) symptoms caused mainly by liver involvement at presentation; (2) absence of distant lymphadenopathy, palpable clinically at presentation or detected during staging radiologic studies; and (3) absence of leukemic blood involvement in the peripheral blood smear.7 Other authors define PHL as having major liver involvement without evidence of extrahepatic involvement for at least 6 months.8 In our case, the multiple large lesions of the liver are consistent with advanced stage PHL with retroperitoneal lymph nodes and right lung metastasis. DLBCL is the most common histopathological type of lymphoma (65.9%). Other types have been described less commonly, including diffuse mixed large-and small-cell, lymphoblastic, diffuse histiocytic, mantle cell, and small noncleaved or Burkitt lymphoma.57

Currently, there is no consensus on PHL treatment. The therapeutic options include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of therapies.7 Most evidence regarding treatment and tumor response comes from case series, as PHLs are rare. Surgical resection in a series of 8 patients showed a cumulative 1- and 2-year survival rate of 66.7% and 55.6%, respectively.9 Chemotherapy is the recommended treatment option for extra-nodal DLBCL, making it a choice also for the treatment of PHL.10 Page and colleagues demonstrated that combination chemotherapy regimens helped achieve remission for 83.3% of patients.11 Since PHL is chemo-sensitive, most patients are treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with surgery and radiotherapy. The most common chemotherapy regimen is R-CHOP for CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma. The use of the R-CHOP regimen has been reported to achieve complete remission in primary DLBCL of the liver.12

CONCLUSIONS

Primary DLBCL of the liver is a very rare disease without specific clinical manifestations, biochemical indicators, or radiologic features except for space-occupying liver lesions. However, patients’ conditions can deteriorate rapidly at an advanced stage, as demonstrated in our case. DLBCL requires a high level of suspicion for its early diagnosis and treatment and should be considered in the differential diagnosis for any hepatic space-occupying lesions.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Lynne Dryer, ARNP, for her clinical assistance with this patient and in the preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations— including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Patient consent for the publication was obtained from the patient in this case report.

References

  • 1.Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114(5):937–951. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Do TD, Neurohr C, Michl M, Reiser MF, Zech CJ. An unusual case of primary hepatic lymphoma mimicking sarcoidosis in MRI. Acta Radiol Short Rep. 2014;3(4) doi: 10.1177/2047981613493625. 2047981613493625 Published 2014 May 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Laroia ST, Rastogi A, Panda D, Sarin SK. Primary hepatic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: an enigma beyond the liver, a case report. World J Oncol. 2015;6(2):338–344. doi: 10.14740/wjon900W. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yousuf S, Szpejda M, Mody M, et al. A unique case of primary hepatic CD-30 positive, CD 15-negative classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma presenting as fever of unknown origin and acute hepatic failure. Haematol Int J. 2018;2(3):1–6. doi: 10.23880/hij-16000127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ugurluer G, Miller RC, Li Y, et al. Primary hepatic lymphoma: a retrospective, multicenter rare cancer network study. Rare Tumors. 2016;8(3):118–123. doi: 10.4081/rt.2016.6502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Noronha V, Shafi NQ, Obando JÁ, Kummar S. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the liver. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;53(3):199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lei KI. Primary non-Hodgkins lymphoma of the liver. Leuk Lymphoma. 1989;29(3–4):293–299. doi: 10.3109/10428199809068566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caccamo D, Pervez NK, Marchevsky A. Primary lymphoma of the liver in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110(6):553–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang XW, Tan WF, Yu WL, et al. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of primary hepatic lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(47):6016–6019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i47.6016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sehn LH, Donaldson J, Chhanabhai M, et al. Introduction of combined CHP plus rituximab therapy dramatically improved outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5027–5033. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Page RD, Romaguera JE, Osborne B, et al. Primary hepatic lymphoma: favorable outcome after combination of chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001;92(8):2023–2029. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011015)92-8&#x0003c;2023::aid-cncr1540&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zafar MS, Aggarwal S, Bhalla S. Complete response to chemotherapy in primary hepatic lymphoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(1):114–116. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.95187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Federal Practitioner are provided here courtesy of Frontline Medical Communications

RESOURCES