Table 4.

Evaluation Methods for Included Advocacy Curricula

First author, year		Evaluation reported	Knowledge/skills	Feedback/perceptions	Evaluation methods	Quality scale*
Andrews 2019		No				C
Bromage 2019		Yes	●	●	Focus group; stakeholder feedback	A
Campbell 2020		Yes	●	●	Written feedback; interview	A
Emery 2022		Yes		●	Survey; large group debrief	A
Gimpel 2017		Yes	●	●	Survey; participant outcomes	A
Goss 2020		Yes	●	●	Survey; participant outcomes	A
Hirsch 2017		Yes	●	●	Survey	B
Jones 2018		Yes		●	Survey; measures of blog success	A
Khera 2022		Yes		●	Survey	B
Knox 2018		Yes		●	Focus group; interview; stakeholder feedback	A
Krishnaswami 2018		Yes	●	●	Participant outcomes; 10-year evaluation plan with process and outcome measures	A
Lax 2019		Yes	●	●	Survey	B
Majeed 2020		Yes	●	●	Survey; written feedback	A
Michelson 2019		Yes	●	●	focus group; interview	A
Neff 2020		Yes	●	●	Written feedback	B
Oldfield 2018		No				C
Pak-Gorstein 2018		Yes	●	●	Survey; stakeholder feedback; participant outcomes; self-assessments	A
Piel 2018		No				C
Sieplinga 2021		Yes	●	●	Survey; stakeholder feedback; RVUs in clinic before/after curriculum	A
Teran 2020		Yes	●	●	Survey	B
Traba 2021		No				C
Vance 2020; Kennedy 2018	Harvard	Yes		●	Survey	B
	Hennepin	No				C
	UCSF	No				C
	U. Illinois	Yes		●	Survey	B
	U. Michigan	No				C
	UTSW	No				C
	Yale	No				C
Webber 2018		Yes		●	Survey; focus group; interview; stakeholder feedback	A
Whetstone 2018		No				C
Ying 2019		Yes	●	●	Survey	B

*Each curriculum was scored for its evaluation characteristics: A for multimodal evaluation, B for single method of evaluation, and C for no evaluation