Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 21;3(6):100224. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2023.100224

Table 3.

Distribution of IE Cases and Nonallergic Noneczema Controls Based on the Various Established Dietary Indices among 11,494 Young Chinese Adults in the SMCGES Cohort

IE Presentation IE Case (n = 511) Nonallergic Noneczema Control (n = 2,978) Chi-Square P-Value
DQDPS
Low total protein score 150 (29.4%) 841 (28.2%) 5.308 × 10−1
Moderate total protein score 176 (34.4%) 1103 (37.0%)
High total protein score 185 (36.2%) 1034 (34.7%)
APS
Low APS 182 (35.6%) 1041 (35.0%) 8.786 × 10−1
Moderate APS 158 (30.9%) 906 (30.4%)
High APS 171 (33.5%) 1031 (34.6%)
PPS
Low PPS 157 (30.7%) 856 (28.7%) 2.721 × 10−1
Moderate PPS 163 (31.9%) 1059 (35.6%)
High PPS 191 (37.4%) 1063 (35.7%)
Combined APS/PPS
High PPS and low APS 44 (8.60 %) 215 (7.20 %) 8.106 × 10−2
High PPS and moderate APS 65 (12.7%) 303 (10.2%)
High PPS and high APS 82 (16.0%) 545 (18.3%)
Moderate PPS and low APS 53 (10.4%) 385 (12.9%)
Moderate PPS and moderate APS 60 (11.7%) 422 (14.2%)
Moderate PPS and high APS 50 (9.80%) 252 (8.50%)
Low PPS and low APS 85 (16.6%) 441 (14.8%)
Low PPS and moderate APS 46 (9.00%) 306 (10.3%)
Low PPS and high APS 26 (5.10%) 109 (3.70%)
Combined dietary scores (DPS and DFS)
High PPS and low-fat score 103 (20.2%) 502 (16.9%) 3.815 × 10−1
High PPS and moderate-fat score 51 (10.0%) 333 (11.2%)
High PPS and high-fat score 37 (7.20%) 228 (7.70%)
Moderate PPS and low-fat score 58 (11.4%) 400 (13.4%)
Moderate PPS and moderate-fat score 57 (11.2%) 411 (13.8%)
Moderate PPS and high-fat score 48 (9.40%) 248 (8.30%)
Low PPS and low-fat score 26 (5.10%) 135 (4.50%)
Low PPS and moderate-fat score 54 (10.6%) 283 (9.50%)
Low PPS and high-fat score 77 (15.1%) 438 (14.7%)
Combined dietary scores (DPS and QDGIS)
High PPS and good QDGIS class 116 (22.7%) 566 (19.0 %) 6.260 × 10−2
High PPS and moderate QDGIS class 53 (10.4%) 384 (12.9%)
High PPS and poor QDGIS class 22 (4.30%) 113 (3.80%)
Moderate PPS and good QDGIS class 78 (15.3%) 429 (14.4%)
Moderate PPS and moderate QDGIS class 56 (11.0%) 414 (13.9%)
Moderate PPS and poor QDGIS class 29 (5.70%) 216 (7.30%)
Low PPS and good QDGIS class 21 (4.10%) 161 (5.40%)
Low PPS and moderate QDGIS class 71 (13.9%) 327 (11.0%)
Low PPS and poor QDGIS class 65 (12.7%) 368 (12.4%)

Abbreviations: APS, animal protein score; DPS, dietary protein score; DQDPS, diet quality based on dietary protein score; IE, intrinsic eczema; PPS, plant protein score; QDGIS, quality of diet based on glycaemic index score; SMCGES, Singapore/Malaysia Cross-sectional Genetic Epidemiology Study.

A chi-square P-value < 0.001 (as adjusted by Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons) is considered statistically significant.