Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;2023(9):CD014791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014791.pub2

Marx 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT, parallel‐group design
Numbers randomized (total and per group): total 51 participants
Unit of randomization: person
Masking: not reported
Exclusions and losses to follow‐up (total and per group): not reported
Number analyzed (total and per group): not reported
Unit of analysis (person or eye): person
Study duration (planned and actual): 4 weeks
Intervention duration: 4 weeks
How were missing data handled: not reported
Sample size and power calculation: not reported
Participants Country: Germany
Setting: university clinics
Inclusion criteria: neophyte contact lens wearers
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Baseline characteristicsRefractive condition: not reported
Nelfilcon A
  • women (n, %): not reported

  • age (mean, SD): not reported

  • race/ethnicity (n, %): not reported

  • habitual wearers (n, %): 0 (0%)


Narafilcon A
  • women (n, %): not reported

  • age (mean, SD): not reported

  • race/ethnicity (n, %): not reported

  • habitual wearers (n, %): 0 (0%)


Overall (N = 51)
  • women (n, %): not reported

  • age (mean, SD): not reported

  • race/ethnicity (n, %): not reported

  • habitual wearers (n, %): 0 (0%)

Interventions Nelfilcon A
  • material: hydrogel

  • replacement frequency: daily


Narafilcon A
  • material: silicon hydrogel

  • replacement frequency: daily

Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • subjective ratings of overall comfort, vision, handling, and satisfaction

  • acceptable lens fit

  • average wearing time and comfortable wearing time

  • willingness to purchase


Secondary outcomes: not specified
Adverse outcomes (Y/N), if yes, please describe: N
Measurement time points: 1, 2, and 4 weeks
Notes Sponsorship source: CIBA VISION Corporation
Author's name: Sebastian Marx
Institution: Ernst Abbe University of Applied Sciences
Conflicts of interest: not reported
Publication language: English
Trial register: not reported