Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;20:112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01513-2

Table 2.

Regression analyses for calorie labelling on size choice, kcals ordered and money spent for the three food outlets

Estimate Std. error Sig. Odds ratio 95% CI
Lower
95% CI Upper
Size choice 1
Coffee shop beverage size
Pseudo R 2 0.067
Labelling condition (kcal labels) 0.03 0.13 0.843 1.03 0.80 1.32
Sandwich size
Pseudo R 2 0.156
Labelling condition (kcal labels) 0.09 0.14 0.509 1.09 0.83 1.43
Fast food meal size
Pseudo R 2 0.124
Labelling condition (kcal labels) 0.11 0.13 0.376 1.12 0.87 1.44
Kcals ordered 2
Coffee shop
Adjusted R 2 0.097
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -18.95 7.19 0.009 - -33.07 -4.84
Sandwich shop
Adjusted R 2 0.119
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -0.43 20.37 0.983 - -40.39 39.53
Fast food outlet
Adjusted R 2 0.178
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -54.19 16.24 < 0.001 - -86.04 -22.33
Money spent 3
Coffee shop
Adjusted R 2 0.082
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -0.02 0.04 0.575 - -0.10 0.06
Sandwich shop
Adjusted R 2 0.112
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -0.02 0.19 0.924 - -0.39 0.36
Fast food outlet
Adjusted R 2 0.138
Labelling condition (kcal labels) -0.17 0.07 0.016 - -0.30 -0.03

1Estimates indicate the average change in the log odds of the response variable associated with a one unit increase in each predictor variable, 2 Estimates are in kcals, 3Estimates in pound sterling