TABLE 4.
Perceptions of data use by care teams in the CCN and CFLN
| CCN care team respondents a (n = 25) | CFLN care team respondents a (n = 61) | P‐value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data access, n (%) often/always | |||
| Process to support timely data entry | 17 (68.0) | 58 (96.7) | <0.001 |
| Data I have is timely | 17 (68.0) | 58 (95.1) | <0.001 |
| Easily access the data I need to conduct quality improvement projects | 17 (68.0) | 52 (85.2) | NS |
| Data display and interpretation, n (%) often/always | |||
| Can create run/SPC charts to graph key outcomes of our site performance | 13 (52.0) | 36 (61.0) | NS |
| Provided with run/SPC charts to graph key outcomes of our site performance | 6 (26.1) | 29 (49.2) | NS |
| Data is presented to me in a way that is easy to interpret | 14 (58.3) | 48 (78.7) | NS |
| Data into action, n (%) often/always | |||
| Data is presented to me in a way that informs our next steps in QI | 13 (56.5) | 47 (77.0) | NS |
| Data is routinely shared with all members of our improvement team | 16 (66.7) | 58 (95.1) | <0.001 |
| Data is shared with institutional leaders | 10 (45.5) | 31 (54.4) | NS |
| I know how our local CF program performs on key measures compared to other programs within the CF community | 16 (66.7) | 48 (80.0) | NS |
a
Analyses are limited to care team members, including CF program directors or physician leaders and CF program coordinators and QILs.