Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;136(18):2187–2194. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002797

Table 3.

Cross-tabulation and chi-squared test results of treatment efficiency in pain relief among patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Treatment effect Flurbiprofen Loxoprofen Chi-Squared test P-value
mITT analysis* N = 124 N = 125
24 h most severe pain level 14.888 <0.001
Very effective 44 (35.48) 27 (21.60)
Effective 70 (56.45) 67 (53.60)
Not effective 10 (8.06) 31 (24.80)
24 h resting pain level 11.691 0.003
Very effective 45 (36.29) 33 (26.40)
Effective 49 (39.52) 36 (28.80)
Not effective 30 (24.19) 56 (44.80)
24 h exercise pain level 7.733 0.021
Very effective 47 (37.90) 31 (24.80)
Effective 64 (51.61) 68 (54.40)
Not effective 13 (10.48) 26 (20.80)
Current pain level 14.877 <0.001
Very effective 43 (34.68) 19 (15.20)
Effective 71 (57.26) 84 (67.20)
Not effective 10 (8.06) 22 (17.60)
PP analysis N = 115 N = 119
Change in 24 h most severe pain level score 22.280 <0.001
Very effective 44 (38.26) 27 (22.69)
Effective 68 (59.13) 66 (55.46)
Not effective 3 (2.61) 26 (21.85)
Change in pain level score at 24 h resting time 14.384 <0.001
Very effective 44 (38.26) 33 (27.73)
Effective 49 (42.61) 36 (30.25)
Not effective 22 (19.13) 50 (42.02)
Change in pain level score during 24 h exercise 11.313 0.004
Very effective 46 (40.00) 31 (26.05)
Effective 63 (54.78) 67 (56.30)
Not effective 6 (5.22) 21 (17.65)
Change in current pain level score 22.976 <0.001
Very effective 43 (37.39) 19 (15.97)
Effective 70 (60.87) 82 (68.91)
Not effective 2 (1.74) 18 (15.13)

Data are presented as n (%). *One patient without complete baseline record in the flurbiprofen cataplasms was excluded. 10 and 6 patients were lost to follow-up in flurbiprofen and loxoprofen groups, respectively. mITT: Modified intention to treat; PP: Per-protocol.