TABLE 3.
Correlational research | Detection method | Detection indexa | Number of cases | Detection duration | Lower limit of detectionb | Sample | Measurement | Clinical transformation/commercialization |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kanamori, et al (2014)14 | FMCA-Cold PCR | IDH1/2 | 28 (intraoperative) | 60–65 min | – | Tumor | Accuracy: 100% | N |
Santagata, et al (2014)15 | DESI-MS | 2-HG | 35 (intraoperative) | >10 min | 3 μmol/g | Tumor | Accuracy: 100% | Y |
Shankar, et al (2015)16 | PNA/LNA-PCR (OperaGen) | IDH1 R132H/L/C/G/S TERTp |
190 (frozen + archived fixed) | <60 min | Allele content>0.1% | Tumor | Sensitivity: 96% Specificity: 100% |
Y |
Ohka, et al (2017)17 | I-Densy-Regular PCR | IDH1 R132H | 11 (intraoperative) | 90–100 min | 3.25 ng/μL | Tumor/CSF | Accuracy: 100% | Y |
Xu, et al (2019)18 | GC-MS | 2-HG | 220 (frozen) + 87 (intraoperative) | 40 min | 5.4 μM/g−2 mM/g | Tumor | Accuracy: 100% | N |
Brown, et al (2019)19 | Mini-MS | 2-HG | 25 (biopsy) | 3 min | - | Tumor | Accuracy: 100% | Y |
Alfaro,et al (2019)10 | DESI-MS | 2-HG | 37 (frozen) + 25 (biopsy) | 5 min | >100 ng/mg | Tumor | Sensitivity: 100% Specificity: 100% |
Y |
Sim, et al (2019)20 | HPLC-MS/MS | 2-HG/R-2-HG/S-2-HG | 87 (intraoperative) | 60 min | 10 ng/mL | Tumor | Sensitivity: 97% Specificity: 100% |
N |
Diplas, et al (2019)21 | LNA-PCR (GliomaDx) | IDH1/2 TERTp |
39 (frozen) | <60 min | 10 ng/mL | Tumor | Sensitivity: 99%–100% | Y |
Avsar, et al (2020)22 | 3m-ARMS | IDH1/2 | 236 (frozen) | 60 min | <100 fg | Tumor/CSF/blood | Accuracy: 98.3% NPV: 100% |
N |
Fujioka, (2021)23 | Digital PCR | IDH/TERTp/H3 | 34 (intraoperative) + 11 (preoperative CSF) | 110–147 min | 20 ng/mL | CSF | FP = 0 | Y |
Our research | AIGS-Realtime PCR | IDH1 R132H/L/C/G/S TERTp |
105 (frozen) + 37 (intraoperative) | 59.2 min | 500 copies/mL | Tumor | Accuracy: 100% | Y |
AIGS, automatic integrated gene detection system; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase.
The detection index is only based on the test results of the number of cases included in the author's article.
The difference in the measurement unit of the lower limit of detection is caused by the difference in detection technology and the detection method.